Manometric Evaluation of Esophageal Motility in Patients With Non-cardiac Chest Pain: A Retrospective Study From a Tertiary Center in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is a frequent clinical problem that often mandates intensive investigations for the exclusion of cardiac etiology. Esophageal motility disorders are a leading cause of NCCP; however, data from the Middle East are lacking. This was a retrospective study of 41 male patients (n=41; 100%) aged 23-57 years, who were referred to a tertiary care institution in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, with NCCP. All patients had high-resolution manometry (HRM), upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and laboratory testing. HRM showed ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) as the most common abnormality in 12 patients (n=12; 30%), followed by distal esophageal spasm (DES) in five patients (n=5; 12.5%), while achalasia and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction were infrequent. Importantly, 18 patients (n=18; 45%) with routine endoscopy had abnormal HRM patterns, reflecting the shortcomings of endoscopy alone. We did not find a significant correlation between endoscopic and HRM findings. These findings support the importance of including HRM in NCCP diagnostic algorithms to enhance accuracy and inform personalized, patient-centered management in this area.
Authors
- Jennifer Joseph (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9203-6275)
- Mathew Vadukoot Lazar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0073-579X)
- Amit Hanmant Shejal
- Divya Jose
- Rakesh Gupta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5443-569X)
- Seshadri Raju (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6102-9307)
- Monica Jadhav
- Hardik Patel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2256-9586)
- Sarath Babu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6430-2476)
- Baiju Faizal Puthenkote
Institutions
- Abu Dhabi Health Services (AE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cureus
- Published
- 2025-12-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.98290
- Primary Topic
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00