Enhanced Detection of Adverse Glycemic Events in Hospital with Unmasked Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Point-of-Care Testing in People with Type 1 Diabetes
Almost all AGE in hospital were detected by CGM, with few detected by POC alone. Compared to POC, CGM detected AGE earlier, with a lesser glycemic extreme, although unmasked CGM use may have influenced these results. Detecting AGE in hospital appears superior with CGM compared to POC glucose alone in people with T1D.
Authors
- Rahul Barmanray (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1433-2239)
- Ailie Connell
- Brintha Krishnamoorthi
- Mervyn Kyi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4341-8250)
- Debra Renouf
- Spiros Fourlanos
- Cherie Chiang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9392-6771)
- Ray Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6145-9726)
Institutions
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Eastern Health (AU)
- Peninsula Health (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
- Published
- 2025-12-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968251395088
- Primary Topic
- Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00