Graph Based, Adaptive, Multiarm, Multiple Endpoint, Two‐Stage Designs

The graph-based approach to multiple testing is an intuitive method that enables a study team to represent clearly, through a directed graph, its priorities for hierarchical testing of multiple hypotheses, and for propagating the available type-1 error from rejected or dropped hypotheses to hypotheses yet to be tested. Although originally developed for single-stage nonadaptive designs, we show how it may be extended to two-stage designs that permit early identification of efficacious treatments, adaptive sample size re-estimation, dropping of hypotheses, and changes in the hierarchical testing strategy at the end of stage one. Two approaches are available for preserving the familywise error rate in the presence of these adaptive changes, the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ p $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> value combination method, and the conditional error rate method. In this investigation, we will present the statistical methodology underlying each approach and will compare the operating characteristics of the two methods in a large simulation experiment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70237
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Graph Based, Adaptive, Multiarm, Multiple Endpoint, Two‐Stage Designs

Martin Posch, Cyrus R. Mehta, Asima Mukhopadhyay
1 citations
Statistics in Medicine
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
2.63
article

Graph Based, Adaptive, Multiarm, Multiple Endpoint, Two‐Stage Designs

Martin Posch, Cyrus R. Mehta, Asima Mukhopadhyay
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The graph-based approach to multiple testing is an intuitive method that enables a study team to represent clearly, through a directed graph, its priorities for hierarchical testing of multiple hypotheses, and for propagating the available type-1 error from rejected or dropped hypotheses to hypotheses yet to be tested. Although originally developed for single-stage nonadaptive designs, we show how it may be extended to two-stage designs that permit early identification of efficacious treatments, adaptive sample size re-estimation, dropping of hypotheses, and changes in the hierarchical testing strategy at the end of stage one. Two approaches are available for preserving the familywise error rate in the presence of these adaptive changes, the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:annotation>$$ p $$</mml:annotation></mml:semantics> </mml:math> value combination method, and the conditional error rate method. In this investigation, we will present the statistical methodology underlying each approach and will compare the operating characteristics of the two methods in a large simulation experiment.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 44(28-30)
Harvard University (US), Medical University of Vienna (AT), Cytel (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.