Automation and Augmentation in Theological Perspective

Abstract AI enables forms of automation that threaten unemployment and deskilling, eliminating important opportunities for the development of virtue. The concomitant loss of virtue and meaningful employment makes it a theological problem from the perspective of Catholic social teaching and theological anthropology. These problems arise in part from a design paradigm that encourages forms of AI that replace humans. This essay suggests that an alternative design paradigm that encourages programs that augment rather than replace human action can support the development of virtue and mitigate many of the problems posed by AI in the workplace. Even so, a Human Augmentation framework can itself go astray if driven by an incorrect anthropology inspired by transhumanism or bureaucratic imperatives. It is therefore necessary for theological ethics to engage in specific design discussions using the resources of theological anthropology and virtue ethics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Theology
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.70063
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automation and Augmentation in Theological Perspective

Paul Scherz
Modern Theology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Automation and Augmentation in Theological Perspective

Paul Scherz
article en

Abstract

Abstract AI enables forms of automation that threaten unemployment and deskilling, eliminating important opportunities for the development of virtue. The concomitant loss of virtue and meaningful employment makes it a theological problem from the perspective of Catholic social teaching and theological anthropology. These problems arise in part from a design paradigm that encourages forms of AI that replace humans. This essay suggests that an alternative design paradigm that encourages programs that augment rather than replace human action can support the development of virtue and mitigate many of the problems posed by AI in the workplace. Even so, a Human Augmentation framework can itself go astray if driven by an incorrect anthropology inspired by transhumanism or bureaucratic imperatives. It is therefore necessary for theological ethics to engage in specific design discussions using the resources of theological anthropology and virtue ethics.

Modern Theology
University of Notre Dame (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.