Efficacy of 3 mg versus 6 mg Oral Melatonin in Improving Sleep Quality among Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Introduction: Melatonin, a molecule found in nearly all living organisms, plays a vital role in regulating circadian rhythm and sleep, while also influencing immune function, cell growth, and endocrine processes. Its role in improving sleep in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients remains under investigation. Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of oral melatonin at two different doses (3 mg vs 6 mg) on sleep characteristics in ICU patients. Material and Methods: This single-centred, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B. D. Sharma Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS), Rohtak, Haryana, India, on 46 adult ICU patients {≥18 years, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≥10}. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either 3 mg or 6 mg melatonin orally or via feeding tube at 9:00 pm for three consecutive nights, along with earplugs and eye masks. Sleep parameters were recorded from day 1 to day 3. Agitation was assessed using the Riker Sedation-Agitation (RSA) scale at 10:00 am and 6:00 pm. The length of ICU stay was noted. Data were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0, with p-value≤0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Baseline demographics and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) status were comparable between groups. Total sleep time in the 3 mg group: 7.57±2.57 h (day 1) to 8.48±2.92 h (day 3); 6 mg group: 9.48±2.74 h to 9.93±2.55 h with no significant overall difference (p-value=0.780). Night sleep was higher on day 2 in the 6 mg group (p-value=0.009), but no significant overall trend (p-value=0.084). Day sleep, arousals, and RSA scores were non significant between the two groups (p-value>0.05), and the mean ICU stay was 4.35±1.46 days in the 3 mg group and 4.48±1.55 days in the 6 mg group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p-value=0.781). Both doses were well-tolerated without major adverse effects. Conclusion: Higher-dose melatonin (6 mg) significantly improved nocturnal sleep on one study day compared to 3 mg but showed no overall benefit in total sleep time, diurnal sleep, arousals, delirium, or sedation needs. Both doses were safe and well-tolerated.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2026/79401.22317
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of 3 mg versus 6 mg Oral Melatonin in Improving Sleep Quality among Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Anju Ghai, Vivek Kataria, Garima Anant, Aarushi Sahni
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Efficacy of 3 mg versus 6 mg Oral Melatonin in Improving Sleep Quality among Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Anju Ghai, Vivek Kataria, Garima Anant, Aarushi Sahni
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Melatonin, a molecule found in nearly all living organisms, plays a vital role in regulating circadian rhythm and sleep, while also influencing immune function, cell growth, and endocrine processes. Its role in improving sleep in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients remains under investigation. Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of oral melatonin at two different doses (3 mg vs 6 mg) on sleep characteristics in ICU patients. Material and Methods: This single-centred, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B. D. Sharma Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS), Rohtak, Haryana, India, on 46 adult ICU patients {≥18 years, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≥10}. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either 3 mg or 6 mg melatonin orally or via feeding tube at 9:00 pm for three consecutive nights, along with earplugs and eye masks. Sleep parameters were recorded from day 1 to day 3. Agitation was assessed using the Riker Sedation-Agitation (RSA) scale at 10:00 am and 6:00 pm. The length of ICU stay was noted. Data were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0, with p-value≤0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Baseline demographics and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) status were comparable between groups. Total sleep time in the 3 mg group: 7.57±2.57 h (day 1) to 8.48±2.92 h (day 3); 6 mg group: 9.48±2.74 h to 9.93±2.55 h with no significant overall difference (p-value=0.780). Night sleep was higher on day 2 in the 6 mg group (p-value=0.009), but no significant overall trend (p-value=0.084). Day sleep, arousals, and RSA scores were non significant between the two groups (p-value>0.05), and the mean ICU stay was 4.35±1.46 days in the 3 mg group and 4.48±1.55 days in the 6 mg group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p-value=0.781). Both doses were well-tolerated without major adverse effects. Conclusion: Higher-dose melatonin (6 mg) significantly improved nocturnal sleep on one study day compared to 3 mg but showed no overall benefit in total sleep time, diurnal sleep, arousals, delirium, or sedation needs. Both doses were safe and well-tolerated.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.