Kant on Educating for Disgust

This paper explores the role of disgust education in Kant, considering its aesthetic and moral implications. Kant distinguishes between physical education, shared with animals, and moral education, which is essential for living according to freedom. Disgust, according to Kant, functions as a defense mechanism against one’s animality and impulses that hinder human elevation, representing resistance to bodily drives and moral vices. I propose a taxonomy of disgust, differentiating between physical disgust related to the senses and cultural, as well as moral disgust associated with repulsion towards vice and evil. In anthropological context, disgust is connected to notions of boredom, monotony, and sensory saturation – elements that impede moral vitality. Kant views aesthetic education as a means to perfect humanity, fostering a civilization that moves away from natural brutality. In conclusion, I argue that disgust, far from being an antisocial emotion, serves as a valuable pedagogical and cultural tool in the process of human civilization and refinement, by linking empirical feelings, aesthetics, and morality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Croatian Journal of Philosophy
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52685/cjp.25.74.6
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kant on Educating for Disgust

Serena Feloj
Croatian Journal of Philosophy
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Kant on Educating for Disgust

Serena Feloj
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the role of disgust education in Kant, considering its aesthetic and moral implications. Kant distinguishes between physical education, shared with animals, and moral education, which is essential for living according to freedom. Disgust, according to Kant, functions as a defense mechanism against one’s animality and impulses that hinder human elevation, representing resistance to bodily drives and moral vices. I propose a taxonomy of disgust, differentiating between physical disgust related to the senses and cultural, as well as moral disgust associated with repulsion towards vice and evil. In anthropological context, disgust is connected to notions of boredom, monotony, and sensory saturation – elements that impede moral vitality. Kant views aesthetic education as a means to perfect humanity, fostering a civilization that moves away from natural brutality. In conclusion, I argue that disgust, far from being an antisocial emotion, serves as a valuable pedagogical and cultural tool in the process of human civilization and refinement, by linking empirical feelings, aesthetics, and morality.

Croatian Journal of PhilosophyVol. 25(74)
University of Pavia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Kant on Educating for Disgust — Serena Feloj · Croatian Journal of Philosophy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS