Experimental and analytical analysis of layered concrete beams with partially stiff interfaces

The behaviour of layered flexural concrete elements is significantly influenced by the characteristics of the interface between layers. The impact of the interface must be considered during the analysis of such structural elements. This study presents an analysis of layered flexural element interface characteristics, flexural layered element behaviour and a novel analytical approach to predicting the deflection of layered concrete elements. The proposed method includes (1) a model describing the interface behaviour and (2) a deflection model for layered flexural elements. To validate the analytical models and examine the structural performance of layered concrete elements, six layered concrete beams were constructed and tested. The beams were categorized based on their interface connectors: type P beams with connectors perpendicular to the interface, and L1 and L2 beams with connectors resembling lattice girder. Additionally, each beam type was constructed with two cross-sections configurations: one with 50 mm and 200 mm layers, and another with 80 mm and 170 mm layers. Experimental results indicated that L2 beams exhibited the highest capacity before adhesive interface failure (reaching 44.3 kN and 36.2 kN load) and performed well when friction and dowel action governed the interface behaviour. Conversely, L1 beams showed the lowest adhesive resistance (reaching 25.6 kN and 25.1 kN load), while P beams demonstrated moderate performance (experiencing adhesive failure at 31.7 kN and 29.4 kN). Additionally, beams with thicker bottom layers exhibited higher flexural capacity across all behavioural stages. Moreover, different connector arrangements were the cause of different beam cracking patterns. Analytical models were used to predict the behaviour of layered beams. The analytical results were similar to the experimental results. Furthermore, differential concrete layer shrinkage was considered in the analytical calculations. The reduction in interface adhesive resistance due to differential shrinkage was found to be in the range of 0.56–0.62 MPa. • Layered concrete beams with varying connector setups and layer thicknesses tested. • Connector setups and layer thicknesses affected beam capacity and cracking. • Novel model proposed for predicting interface behaviour. • Novel deflection model proposed for flexural layered concrete elements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Structures
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121885
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental and analytical analysis of layered concrete beams with partially stiff interfaces

Juozas Valivonis, Gintaris Kaklauskas, Juozas Masėnas
Engineering Structures
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Experimental and analytical analysis of layered concrete beams with partially stiff interfaces

Juozas Valivonis, Gintaris Kaklauskas, Juozas Masėnas
article en

Abstract

The behaviour of layered flexural concrete elements is significantly influenced by the characteristics of the interface between layers. The impact of the interface must be considered during the analysis of such structural elements. This study presents an analysis of layered flexural element interface characteristics, flexural layered element behaviour and a novel analytical approach to predicting the deflection of layered concrete elements. The proposed method includes (1) a model describing the interface behaviour and (2) a deflection model for layered flexural elements. To validate the analytical models and examine the structural performance of layered concrete elements, six layered concrete beams were constructed and tested. The beams were categorized based on their interface connectors: type P beams with connectors perpendicular to the interface, and L1 and L2 beams with connectors resembling lattice girder. Additionally, each beam type was constructed with two cross-sections configurations: one with 50 mm and 200 mm layers, and another with 80 mm and 170 mm layers. Experimental results indicated that L2 beams exhibited the highest capacity before adhesive interface failure (reaching 44.3 kN and 36.2 kN load) and performed well when friction and dowel action governed the interface behaviour. Conversely, L1 beams showed the lowest adhesive resistance (reaching 25.6 kN and 25.1 kN load), while P beams demonstrated moderate performance (experiencing adhesive failure at 31.7 kN and 29.4 kN). Additionally, beams with thicker bottom layers exhibited higher flexural capacity across all behavioural stages. Moreover, different connector arrangements were the cause of different beam cracking patterns. Analytical models were used to predict the behaviour of layered beams. The analytical results were similar to the experimental results. Furthermore, differential concrete layer shrinkage was considered in the analytical calculations. The reduction in interface adhesive resistance due to differential shrinkage was found to be in the range of 0.56–0.62 MPa. • Layered concrete beams with varying connector setups and layer thicknesses tested. • Connector setups and layer thicknesses affected beam capacity and cracking. • Novel model proposed for predicting interface behaviour. • Novel deflection model proposed for flexural layered concrete elements.

Engineering StructuresVol. 349
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (LT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.