Re-evaluating DAA therapy in active hepatocellular carcinoma: from controversy to clinical considerations

Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has brought a revolution to the management of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but its role in patients with active hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. Early observations suggested a high rate of HCC recurrence following DAA treatment, raising concerns about a potential oncogenic effect regarding rapid viral clearance. However, subsequent large-scale cohort studies and meta-analyses have not consistently confirmed this finding, leading to an overall neutral conclusion regarding the impact of DAA on HCC recurrence. International guidelines from organizations such as the American Gastroenterological Association(AGA), American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases(AASLD), European Association for the Study of the Liver(EASL), and Korean Association for the Study of the Liver(KASL) offer conflicting recommendations, underscoring the absence of a universal framework for this patient population. While the available evidence is largely heterogeneous and retrospective, current data indicate that DAA therapy can be safely integrated into HCC management without clear evidence of harm. Oncologic outcomes, particularly overall and recurrence-free survival, are most favorable when DAAs are administered in close proximity to curative procedures or in non-transplant therapeutic settings. In contrast, studies in liver transplant candidates often show a neutral effect on oncologic outcomes after adjusting for confounding variables. These findings underscore the necessity of individualized, multidisciplinary decisions based on tumor biology, hepatic reserve, and treatment intent. Prospective studies and validated biomarkers are essential to establish a more definitive framework for optimizing DAA therapy in this complex clinical context.