Ultraflat Honeycomb Stanene Nanoribbons on Au(111)

ABSTRACT Sn on Au(111) undergoes a structural and chemical evolution depending on the submonolayer coverage. After deposition of ML Sn, the coverage was controlled by temperature‐driven desorption. Annealing to produced the striped phase, which consists of alternating honeycomb and square‐like Sn stripes, with periodicities ranging from to , most commonly . Honeycomb regions are atomically flat, with a Sn–Sn bond length of Å. Low‐energy electron diffraction (LEED), atomically resolved scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) reveal structural and chemical transitions as a function of Sn coverage. Without further annealing, deposition yields a square‐like X‐phase atop an interface alloy. Annealing induces dealloying and the formation of the striped phase, while further desorption produces a stretched honeycomb phase. Annealing above , and at ML coverage, the alloy reforms. For the striped phase, a model is proposed where square‐like stripes grow on regions and honeycomb stripes on Au(111). The alternating regions correspond to zigzag stanene nanoribbons of to width. The structural transitions of the Sn/Au(111) system highlight its structural versatility, driven by alloying–dealloying processes at the interface.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Materials Interfaces
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202500861
Primary Topic
Surface Chemistry and Catalysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultraflat Honeycomb Stanene Nanoribbons on Au(111)

U. Berges, H. Hövel, Julian Andreas Hochhaus, C. Westphal et al.
Advanced Materials Interfaces
Surface Chemistry and Catalysis
article

Ultraflat Honeycomb Stanene Nanoribbons on Au(111)

U. Berges, H. Hövel, Julian Andreas Hochhaus, C. Westphal, Alexander Kononov, Philipp Weinert, Stefanie Hilgers
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sn on Au(111) undergoes a structural and chemical evolution depending on the submonolayer coverage. After deposition of ML Sn, the coverage was controlled by temperature‐driven desorption. Annealing to produced the striped phase, which consists of alternating honeycomb and square‐like Sn stripes, with periodicities ranging from to , most commonly . Honeycomb regions are atomically flat, with a Sn–Sn bond length of Å. Low‐energy electron diffraction (LEED), atomically resolved scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) reveal structural and chemical transitions as a function of Sn coverage. Without further annealing, deposition yields a square‐like X‐phase atop an interface alloy. Annealing induces dealloying and the formation of the striped phase, while further desorption produces a stretched honeycomb phase. Annealing above , and at ML coverage, the alloy reforms. For the striped phase, a model is proposed where square‐like stripes grow on regions and honeycomb stripes on Au(111). The alternating regions correspond to zigzag stanene nanoribbons of to width. The structural transitions of the Sn/Au(111) system highlight its structural versatility, driven by alloying–dealloying processes at the interface.

Advanced Materials InterfacesVol. 12(24)
TU Dortmund University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Surface Chemistry and Catalysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.