The role of top-down and bottom-up factors in parafoveal reading

Recently we have shown that, while reading two words presented simultaneously, one in the fovea and one in the parafovea, participants are more accurate and faster when the two words are semantically related. The present study confirmed and supported the previous results by using the same Rapid Parallel Visual Presentation Paradigm (RPVP) and by changing the relative proportions of unrelated vs. semantically related word pairs. Indeed, differently from other studies where semantically unrelated and related word pairs were equally represented (50% each), in the present study only 30% of word pairs were semantically related. Results showed again an advantage when the two words were semantically related and we interpreted these findings in terms of automaticity between lexical/sublexical units processing and semantic access.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cognition
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcogn.2025.1715617
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of top-down and bottom-up factors in parafoveal reading

Roberta Daini, Silvia Primativo, Marialuisa Martelli, Lisa Saskia Arduino et al.
Frontiers in Cognition
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

The role of top-down and bottom-up factors in parafoveal reading

Roberta Daini, Silvia Primativo, Marialuisa Martelli, Lisa Saskia Arduino, Valentina Bandiera
article en

Abstract

Recently we have shown that, while reading two words presented simultaneously, one in the fovea and one in the parafovea, participants are more accurate and faster when the two words are semantically related. The present study confirmed and supported the previous results by using the same Rapid Parallel Visual Presentation Paradigm (RPVP) and by changing the relative proportions of unrelated vs. semantically related word pairs. Indeed, differently from other studies where semantically unrelated and related word pairs were equally represented (50% each), in the present study only 30% of word pairs were semantically related. Results showed again an advantage when the two words were semantically related and we interpreted these findings in terms of automaticity between lexical/sublexical units processing and semantic access.

Frontiers in CognitionVol. 4
Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.