A sentence-based approach to measuring EU regulatory activity

Researchers who provide overviews of the EU’s regulatory activity typically count the number of directives, regulations and decisions, or subsets thereof, which, however, vary tremendously in scope, length and importance. This paper argues that we need to change the unit of analysis to sentences within legal acts and count how many include regulatory statements. Building on recent advancements in computational linguistics we use (Crawford, S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review,89(3), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082975; Ostrom, E. (2005).Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press) Crawford and Ostrom’s (1995; Ostrom, 2005) Institutional Grammar Tool and natural language processing (NLP) to provide an overview of the EU’s regulatory activity based on the contents of all legal acts adopted and published inCELEX/EUR-Lex from 1952 through 2023. Our data, which we make publicly available, show significant regulatory activity in hitherto under-researched policy areas and that the EU’s regulatory activity has steadily increased since the turn of the century, while the number of adopted acts has been in decline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Public Policy
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2025.2596122
Primary Topic
Legal Language and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A sentence-based approach to measuring EU regulatory activity

Gijs Jan Brandsma, Jens Blom‐Hansen, Kody Moodley, Floris van Hal
Journal of European Public Policy
Legal Language and Interpretation
article

A sentence-based approach to measuring EU regulatory activity

Gijs Jan Brandsma, Jens Blom‐Hansen, Kody Moodley, Floris van Hal
article en

Abstract

Researchers who provide overviews of the EU’s regulatory activity typically count the number of directives, regulations and decisions, or subsets thereof, which, however, vary tremendously in scope, length and importance. This paper argues that we need to change the unit of analysis to sentences within legal acts and count how many include regulatory statements. Building on recent advancements in computational linguistics we use (Crawford, S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review,89(3), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082975; Ostrom, E. (2005).Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press) Crawford and Ostrom’s (1995; Ostrom, 2005) Institutional Grammar Tool and natural language processing (NLP) to provide an overview of the EU’s regulatory activity based on the contents of all legal acts adopted and published inCELEX/EUR-Lex from 1952 through 2023. Our data, which we make publicly available, show significant regulatory activity in hitherto under-researched policy areas and that the EU’s regulatory activity has steadily increased since the turn of the century, while the number of adopted acts has been in decline.

Journal of European Public Policy
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Aarhus University (DK), Netherlands eScience Center (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Legal Language and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A sentence-based approach to measuring EU regulatory activity — Gijs Jan Brandsma, Jens Blom‐Hansen, et al. · Journal of European Public Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS