The Recruitment and Retention of Individuals With Intellectual Disability in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Scoping Review

ABSTRACT Background People with intellectual disabilities face significant health disparities and often encounter barriers in accessing healthcare services. Although research supports the need for reasonable adjustments to improve healthcare access for this population, implementation in acute healthcare settings remains limited. Methods This scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's framework. A systematic search was performed across six databases, including MEDLINE and Scopus, to examine recruitment and retention strategies for individuals with intellectual disabilities in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Results Out of 78 selected studies, three main themes emerged: recruitment through community and organisational support, tailored communication strategies and relationship‐building approaches to enhance participant engagement. The findings highlight challenges related to ethical concerns, consent processes, gatekeeper access and discrimination. Conclusions The review emphasises the importance of inclusive strategies in RCTs involving people with intellectual disabilities. It recommends collaborative efforts, targeted training, flexible research protocols, practical support mechanisms, advocacy and dedicated funding to facilitate disability‐specific trials and ensure equitable, evidence‐based healthcare interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Learning Disabilities
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.70010
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Recruitment and Retention of Individuals With Intellectual Disability in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Scoping Review

Wenyi Tang, Ruth Ryan, Louise Murphy, Owen Doody et al.
British Journal of Learning Disabilities
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

The Recruitment and Retention of Individuals With Intellectual Disability in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Scoping Review

Wenyi Tang, Ruth Ryan, Louise Murphy, Owen Doody, Lisa Bourke, Rosemary Lyons
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background People with intellectual disabilities face significant health disparities and often encounter barriers in accessing healthcare services. Although research supports the need for reasonable adjustments to improve healthcare access for this population, implementation in acute healthcare settings remains limited. Methods This scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's framework. A systematic search was performed across six databases, including MEDLINE and Scopus, to examine recruitment and retention strategies for individuals with intellectual disabilities in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Results Out of 78 selected studies, three main themes emerged: recruitment through community and organisational support, tailored communication strategies and relationship‐building approaches to enhance participant engagement. The findings highlight challenges related to ethical concerns, consent processes, gatekeeper access and discrimination. Conclusions The review emphasises the importance of inclusive strategies in RCTs involving people with intellectual disabilities. It recommends collaborative efforts, targeted training, flexible research protocols, practical support mechanisms, advocacy and dedicated funding to facilitate disability‐specific trials and ensure equitable, evidence‐based healthcare interventions.

British Journal of Learning Disabilities
University of Limerick (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.