Comparative endoscopic ultrasound assessment of the gastric pouch after FundoRing-OAGB and OAGB

The highly effective one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is one of the most widely performed procedures in bariatric/metabolic surgery. However, concerns remain regarding the association of OAGB with bile reflux and long-term weight regain. The FundoRing modification of OAGB (FundoRing-OAGB) incorporates the excluded stomach in a primary fundoplication designed to limit reflux and weight regain by exerting an anti-dilatation effect on the gastric pouch. This comparative prospective post-hoc sub-study included 50 patients (25 per group) randomly selected from participants in a precursor randomized controlled trial (RCT). The sub-study aimed to assess and compare the anatomical integrity and volumetric parameters of the gastric pouch at 1 and 3 years using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in patients who had undergone OAGB with, or without, the FundoRing modification. Measurements included pouch diameter, volume, and wall thickness. At 3 years, patients in the FundoRing-OAGB group (n = 21) had significantly lower pouch diameters (2.8 ± 0.23 cm vs. 3.41 ± 0.4 cm, p = 0.014) and volumes (60.39 ± 10.04 mL vs. 87.93 ± 25.79 mL, p < 0.001) compared to the OAGB group (n = 20). In the FundoRing-OAGB group, at year 3, pouch volume had increased 36.25% vs. an increase of 74.33% in the OAGB group (p < 0.001). Wall thickness and pouch length did not differ significantly. The FundoRing-OAGB modification exerted a significant anti-dilatation effect on the gastric pouch, as confirmed reliably by EUS. This effect may potentially correlate with better long-term weight maintenance; however, these clinical outcomes were not assessed in the present study. Large studies with long-term follow-up are needed to validate these findings and assess their clinical impact. Sub-study of#NCT04834635; registered 8 April 2021 • 3-yr FundoRing-OAGB pouch volume increased 36% vs. 74% with standard OAGB (p < 0.001). • 3-yr FundoRing-OAGB pouch diameter was significantly less than with standard OAGB. • EUS confirmed that FundoRing-OAGB exerted significant gastric pouch anti-dilatation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Surgery
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03386-7
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative endoscopic ultrasound assessment of the gastric pouch after FundoRing-OAGB and OAGB

Bakhtiyar Yelembayev, Kassymkhan Sultanov, Galymjan Duysenov, Jane N. Buchwald et al.
3 citations
BMC Surgery
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
6.02
article

Comparative endoscopic ultrasound assessment of the gastric pouch after FundoRing-OAGB and OAGB

Bakhtiyar Yelembayev, Kassymkhan Sultanov, Galymjan Duysenov, Jane N. Buchwald, Medet Rakhmetov, Oral OAuthorNameov, Bazar Tuleuov
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The highly effective one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is one of the most widely performed procedures in bariatric/metabolic surgery. However, concerns remain regarding the association of OAGB with bile reflux and long-term weight regain. The FundoRing modification of OAGB (FundoRing-OAGB) incorporates the excluded stomach in a primary fundoplication designed to limit reflux and weight regain by exerting an anti-dilatation effect on the gastric pouch. This comparative prospective post-hoc sub-study included 50 patients (25 per group) randomly selected from participants in a precursor randomized controlled trial (RCT). The sub-study aimed to assess and compare the anatomical integrity and volumetric parameters of the gastric pouch at 1 and 3 years using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in patients who had undergone OAGB with, or without, the FundoRing modification. Measurements included pouch diameter, volume, and wall thickness. At 3 years, patients in the FundoRing-OAGB group (n = 21) had significantly lower pouch diameters (2.8 ± 0.23 cm vs. 3.41 ± 0.4 cm, p = 0.014) and volumes (60.39 ± 10.04 mL vs. 87.93 ± 25.79 mL, p < 0.001) compared to the OAGB group (n = 20). In the FundoRing-OAGB group, at year 3, pouch volume had increased 36.25% vs. an increase of 74.33% in the OAGB group (p < 0.001). Wall thickness and pouch length did not differ significantly. The FundoRing-OAGB modification exerted a significant anti-dilatation effect on the gastric pouch, as confirmed reliably by EUS. This effect may potentially correlate with better long-term weight maintenance; however, these clinical outcomes were not assessed in the present study. Large studies with long-term follow-up are needed to validate these findings and assess their clinical impact. Sub-study of#NCT04834635; registered 8 April 2021 • 3-yr FundoRing-OAGB pouch volume increased 36% vs. 74% with standard OAGB (p < 0.001). • 3-yr FundoRing-OAGB pouch diameter was significantly less than with standard OAGB. • EUS confirmed that FundoRing-OAGB exerted significant gastric pouch anti-dilatation.

BMC SurgeryVol. 26(1)
West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov State Medical University (KZ), Semey Medical University (KZ), Astana Medical University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.