A Random‐Effects Approach to Generalized Linear Mixed Model Analysis of Incomplete Longitudinal Data

We propose a random-effects approach to missing values for generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) analysis of longitudinal data. The method converts a GLMM with missing covariates to another GLMM without missing covariates. The standard GLMM analysis tools then apply. The method applies, in particular, to the cases of linear mixed models (LMMs) and logistic regression. Performance of the method is evaluated empirically, and compared with alternative approaches, including the popular MICE procedure of multiple imputation (MI). Theoretical justification of the method is given, and explained, for the patterns observed in the simulation studies. Two real-data examples from healthcare studies are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70343
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Random‐Effects Approach to Generalized Linear Mixed Model Analysis of Incomplete Longitudinal Data

J.Z. Zhang, Jiming Jiang, Thuan Nguyen
Statistics in Medicine
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
article

A Random‐Effects Approach to Generalized Linear Mixed Model Analysis of Incomplete Longitudinal Data

J.Z. Zhang, Jiming Jiang, Thuan Nguyen
article en

Abstract

We propose a random-effects approach to missing values for generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) analysis of longitudinal data. The method converts a GLMM with missing covariates to another GLMM without missing covariates. The standard GLMM analysis tools then apply. The method applies, in particular, to the cases of linear mixed models (LMMs) and logistic regression. Performance of the method is evaluated empirically, and compared with alternative approaches, including the popular MICE procedure of multiple imputation (MI). Theoretical justification of the method is given, and explained, for the patterns observed in the simulation studies. Two real-data examples from healthcare studies are discussed.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 44(28-30)
Oregon Health & Science University (US), University of California, Davis (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.