When Formality Is Costly and Informality Is Legal: Understanding the Administrative Burden of Social Insurance System Design in Low and Middle‐Income Countries

ABSTRACT This paper looks at the extent to which the institutional framework for social insurance (SI) constrains access to contributory schemes, with data from Egypt. We use nationally representative microdata to test how the design results in the exclusion of specific categories of workers. Our findings show that the country witnessed a decline in SI coverage among regular wage workers, despite stipulations of mandatory coverage for this group. The analysis highlights two reinforcing dynamics: legal informality, where workers are excluded by design from joining the system; and costly formality, where workers and employers are deterred by rising contribution floors. The administrative burden relating to conditions of enrollment, contribution costs, and benefit design disincentivize both employers and employees to contribute to the system. The paper also shows that the burden is gendered, as women encounter higher compliance costs due to fragmented work trajectories and informal employment spells.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration and Development
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.70042
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Formality Is Costly and Informality Is Legal: Understanding the Administrative Burden of Social Insurance System Design in Low and Middle‐Income Countries

Ghada Barsoum, Irène Selwaness
Public Administration and Development
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

When Formality Is Costly and Informality Is Legal: Understanding the Administrative Burden of Social Insurance System Design in Low and Middle‐Income Countries

Ghada Barsoum, Irène Selwaness
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper looks at the extent to which the institutional framework for social insurance (SI) constrains access to contributory schemes, with data from Egypt. We use nationally representative microdata to test how the design results in the exclusion of specific categories of workers. Our findings show that the country witnessed a decline in SI coverage among regular wage workers, despite stipulations of mandatory coverage for this group. The analysis highlights two reinforcing dynamics: legal informality, where workers are excluded by design from joining the system; and costly formality, where workers and employers are deterred by rising contribution floors. The administrative burden relating to conditions of enrollment, contribution costs, and benefit design disincentivize both employers and employees to contribute to the system. The paper also shows that the burden is gendered, as women encounter higher compliance costs due to fragmented work trajectories and informal employment spells.

Public Administration and Development
Cairo University (EG), Public Health England (GB), University College London (GB), American University in Cairo (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.