Narratives at the Core: Nuclear Energy Policy, Innovation, and Risk in the U.S. Transition Era

Amid renewed climate commitments and energy security concerns, nuclear energy has re-emerged as a central point of policy debate in the United States. The commissioning of Vogtle Unit 3 in 2023, the first new reactor in over 3 decades, and recent legislation such as the ADVANCE Act of 2024 and the Inflation Reduction Act signal what some have called a nuclear renaissance. However, deep public skepticism, environmental justice concerns, and institutional memory of past failures challenge this momentum. This article uses the Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) to analyze two dominant storylines shaping the United States’ nuclear policy: one framing nuclear energy as an innovative climate solution and the other as a risk-laden, inequitable legacy. These competing narratives shape public opinion, policymaking, and legitimacy, particularly among historically marginalized communities. This article analyzes recent policy shifts, narrative structures, and institutional dynamics and argues that understanding and integrating competing narratives is essential for inclusive, credible, and forward-looking governance. The article offers theoretical insights and practical implications for public administrators navigating one of today’s most contested terrains in energy policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Quarterly
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07349149251396859
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Narratives at the Core: Nuclear Energy Policy, Innovation, and Risk in the U.S. Transition Era

Jyoti Aggarwal, Abdollah Zeraatpisheh
Public Administration Quarterly
Risk Perception and Management
article

Narratives at the Core: Nuclear Energy Policy, Innovation, and Risk in the U.S. Transition Era

Jyoti Aggarwal, Abdollah Zeraatpisheh
article en

Abstract

Amid renewed climate commitments and energy security concerns, nuclear energy has re-emerged as a central point of policy debate in the United States. The commissioning of Vogtle Unit 3 in 2023, the first new reactor in over 3 decades, and recent legislation such as the ADVANCE Act of 2024 and the Inflation Reduction Act signal what some have called a nuclear renaissance. However, deep public skepticism, environmental justice concerns, and institutional memory of past failures challenge this momentum. This article uses the Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) to analyze two dominant storylines shaping the United States’ nuclear policy: one framing nuclear energy as an innovative climate solution and the other as a risk-laden, inequitable legacy. These competing narratives shape public opinion, policymaking, and legitimacy, particularly among historically marginalized communities. This article analyzes recent policy shifts, narrative structures, and institutional dynamics and argues that understanding and integrating competing narratives is essential for inclusive, credible, and forward-looking governance. The article offers theoretical insights and practical implications for public administrators navigating one of today’s most contested terrains in energy policy.

Public Administration Quarterly
The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Risk Perception and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.