Age‐dependent effect of thrombolytics on likelihood of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale improvement in minor strokes

The appropriate acute treatment strategy for minor ischemic stroke, defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> 5, is not as well-defined. Prior studies have demonstrated mixed results regarding the effects of neurovascular interventions on minor stroke patients for optimizing the chances of symptomatic improvement. We performed a retrospective single-center study across 6 years to determine the association between thrombolytics and the likelihood of clinical symptom improvement by 24 h in minor stroke patients across ages. Margin plots were derived from multivariable regression analyses. Of 1172 minor stroke patients, in patients <70 years of age, there was greater than 50% likelihood of improvement with any type of thrombolytic administration. When substratifying by type of thrombolytic, there is greater than 50% odds of improvement in patients <80 years of age treated with alteplase and <70 years of age treated with tenecteplase. Thus, the association between age and likelihood of benefit after thrombolytic treatment in minor stroke patients highlights particular minor stroke subpopulations, particularly younger patients, who may benefit from thrombolytic treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ibrain
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ibra.70008
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Age‐dependent effect of thrombolytics on likelihood of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale improvement in minor strokes

Tudor G. Jovin, Lawrence Garfinkel, Hamza A. Shaikh, Khalid A. Hanafy et al.
Ibrain
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Age‐dependent effect of thrombolytics on likelihood of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale improvement in minor strokes

Tudor G. Jovin, Lawrence Garfinkel, Hamza A. Shaikh, Khalid A. Hanafy, Jane Khalife, Theresa Currier Thomas, Manisha Koneru, Jesse M. Thon, Omnea Elgendy, Karan Patel, Pratit D. Patel, H Schumacher, Michael J. Dubinski, Sonali Vij
article en

Abstract

The appropriate acute treatment strategy for minor ischemic stroke, defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> 5, is not as well-defined. Prior studies have demonstrated mixed results regarding the effects of neurovascular interventions on minor stroke patients for optimizing the chances of symptomatic improvement. We performed a retrospective single-center study across 6 years to determine the association between thrombolytics and the likelihood of clinical symptom improvement by 24 h in minor stroke patients across ages. Margin plots were derived from multivariable regression analyses. Of 1172 minor stroke patients, in patients <70 years of age, there was greater than 50% likelihood of improvement with any type of thrombolytic administration. When substratifying by type of thrombolytic, there is greater than 50% odds of improvement in patients <80 years of age treated with alteplase and <70 years of age treated with tenecteplase. Thus, the association between age and likelihood of benefit after thrombolytic treatment in minor stroke patients highlights particular minor stroke subpopulations, particularly younger patients, who may benefit from thrombolytic treatment.

IbrainVol. 11(4)
Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (US), Cooper University Health Care (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.