The British Army on Trial

Abstract The British government's current approach to holding the British Army accountable for historical crimes during the Northern Ireland Troubles is self‐serving and limited. Since the 1998 peace process, successive governments have adopted a narrow, juridical approach, focussed on prosecuting a handful of individual soldiers for the most egregious crimes like unlawful killings. This strategy deliberately avoids scrutinising the collective responsibility of the political system and Army as a whole, as well as the more mundane, everyday violence perpetrated against the nationalist community. This article argues that this is part of a wider process of colonial amnesia around Britain's role in Northern Ireland. The juridical approach constructs a particular narrative of the Army's role in the conflict, rehabilitating their use of violence, while obscuring broader systemic responsibility. It concludes that, while a more transformative approach to historical justice would be preferable, this remains unlikely.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Political Quarterly
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.70025
Primary Topic
Military History and Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The British Army on Trial

Matthew Whiting
The Political Quarterly
Military History and Strategy
article

The British Army on Trial

Matthew Whiting
article en

Abstract

Abstract The British government's current approach to holding the British Army accountable for historical crimes during the Northern Ireland Troubles is self‐serving and limited. Since the 1998 peace process, successive governments have adopted a narrow, juridical approach, focussed on prosecuting a handful of individual soldiers for the most egregious crimes like unlawful killings. This strategy deliberately avoids scrutinising the collective responsibility of the political system and Army as a whole, as well as the more mundane, everyday violence perpetrated against the nationalist community. This article argues that this is part of a wider process of colonial amnesia around Britain's role in Northern Ireland. The juridical approach constructs a particular narrative of the Army's role in the conflict, rehabilitating their use of violence, while obscuring broader systemic responsibility. It concludes that, while a more transformative approach to historical justice would be preferable, this remains unlikely.

The Political Quarterly
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Military History and Strategy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.