Productivity improvement and Japanese labor-management relations: thoughts and actions of labor unions

Purpose This study explores the contemporary conceptualization of productivity improvement among labor unions in Japan and their approaches to labor-management discussions. Comparing these contemporary relations with those from the postwar period, this study elucidates the characteristics of current labor-management relations and their implications for productivity. Design/methodology/approach This study is an independent analysis by the author using the results of a questionnaire survey of labor unions conducted by a research committee in which the author also participated. The survey was conducted by the Research Committee on Sustainable Economy and Society and Work Styles in the Decline of the Labor Force at the JTUC Union Institute for the Improvement of Living Standards in 2021–2022. The details of the survey are described in the committee’s report. Findings The analysis reveals that one of the reasons for Japan's stagnant productivity is the change in labor–management relations. Labor–management relations in Japan are as cooperative as ever; however, the substance of the relationship has changed. Labor unions take a pro-management stance and do not engage in constructive confrontations that consider the wishes of their members. As a result, labor–management consultations, which are necessary to improve productivity, are inadequate. Originality/value I explore the thoughts and efforts of Japanese labor unions regarding improving productivity as well as the actual state of labor–management consultations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jpeo-04-2025-0019
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Productivity improvement and Japanese labor-management relations: thoughts and actions of labor unions

Sumiko Ebisuno
Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership
Labor Movements and Unions
article

Productivity improvement and Japanese labor-management relations: thoughts and actions of labor unions

Sumiko Ebisuno
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study explores the contemporary conceptualization of productivity improvement among labor unions in Japan and their approaches to labor-management discussions. Comparing these contemporary relations with those from the postwar period, this study elucidates the characteristics of current labor-management relations and their implications for productivity. Design/methodology/approach This study is an independent analysis by the author using the results of a questionnaire survey of labor unions conducted by a research committee in which the author also participated. The survey was conducted by the Research Committee on Sustainable Economy and Society and Work Styles in the Decline of the Labor Force at the JTUC Union Institute for the Improvement of Living Standards in 2021–2022. The details of the survey are described in the committee’s report. Findings The analysis reveals that one of the reasons for Japan's stagnant productivity is the change in labor–management relations. Labor–management relations in Japan are as cooperative as ever; however, the substance of the relationship has changed. Labor unions take a pro-management stance and do not engage in constructive confrontations that consider the wishes of their members. As a result, labor–management consultations, which are necessary to improve productivity, are inadequate. Originality/value I explore the thoughts and efforts of Japanese labor unions regarding improving productivity as well as the actual state of labor–management consultations.

Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership
Rissho University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.