An Augmented Likelihood Approach Incorporating Error‐Prone Auxiliary Data Into a Survival Analysis

In this big data era, we can readily access extensive clinical data from large observational studies or electronic health records (EHR). Data accuracy can vary according to the measurement method. For example, clinical variables extracted by automated computer algorithms or obtained from participant self-reported medical history can be error-prone. Precise data, such as those obtained from a chart review or a gold standard diagnostic test, may only be available on a subset of individuals due to cost or participant burden. We propose a method to augment a regression analysis of a gold standard time-to-event outcome with available error-prone disease diagnoses for the setting where the gold standard is observed on a subset. The proposed model addresses left-truncation and interval-censoring in time-to-event outcomes while leveraging information from the self-reported disease diagnosis in a joint likelihood for the gold standard and error-prone outcomes. The proposed model is applied to the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos data to quantify risk factors associated with diabetes onset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70321
Primary Topic
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Augmented Likelihood Approach Incorporating Error‐Prone Auxiliary Data Into a Survival Analysis

Noorie Hyun, Pamela A. Shaw, Lillian A. Boe
Statistics in Medicine
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
article

An Augmented Likelihood Approach Incorporating Error‐Prone Auxiliary Data Into a Survival Analysis

Noorie Hyun, Pamela A. Shaw, Lillian A. Boe
article en

Abstract

In this big data era, we can readily access extensive clinical data from large observational studies or electronic health records (EHR). Data accuracy can vary according to the measurement method. For example, clinical variables extracted by automated computer algorithms or obtained from participant self-reported medical history can be error-prone. Precise data, such as those obtained from a chart review or a gold standard diagnostic test, may only be available on a subset of individuals due to cost or participant burden. We propose a method to augment a regression analysis of a gold standard time-to-event outcome with available error-prone disease diagnoses for the setting where the gold standard is observed on a subset. The proposed model addresses left-truncation and interval-censoring in time-to-event outcomes while leveraging information from the self-reported disease diagnosis in a joint likelihood for the gold standard and error-prone outcomes. The proposed model is applied to the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos data to quantify risk factors associated with diabetes onset.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 44(28-30)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of Washington (US), Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Augmented Likelihood Approach Incorporating Error‐Prone Auxiliary Data Into a Survival Analysis — Noorie Hyun, Pamela A. Shaw, et al. · Statistics in Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS