Exploring community and expert perceptions of the acceptability of an oropharyngeal gonorrhoea controlled human infection model in Australia

The development of an oropharyngeal gonorrhoea controlled human infection model (CHIM) could result in important translational outcomes, including accelerated development of new drugs and vaccines. Ethical study design for such a model requires community consultation, including assessment of the acceptability of the proposed CHIM among key stakeholders. This qualitative study involved: (i) semi-structured interviews and focus groups with individuals who would be eligible for participation in the proposed oropharyngeal gonorrhoea CHIM, defined as healthy men who have sex with men (MSM) aged 18-50 years living in Victoria (Australia); and, (ii) semi-structured interviews with gonorrhoea experts. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis supported by NVivo. Twenty-seven semi-structured interviews and one focus group were undertaken with 32 individuals between July and November, 2024, comprising 22 potential CHIM participants, and 10 experts. Overall, an oropharyngeal gonorrhoea CHIM was acceptable to most participants. Financial compensation and including only MSM who do not have sex with women were highlighted as key areas of debate. Participants highlighted that recruitment strategies should be sensitive to the stigma associated with gonorrhoea and history of stigma experienced by MSM. An oropharyngeal gonorrhoea CHIM is acceptable to key stakeholders but must be carefully designed to avoid exacerbation of stigma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30975-6
Primary Topic
Reproductive tract infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring community and expert perceptions of the acceptability of an oropharyngeal gonorrhoea controlled human infection model in Australia

Euzebiusz Jamrozik, Louise Anne Keogh, Jane Simone Hocking, Deborah Anne Williamson et al.
Scientific Reports
Reproductive tract infections research
article

Exploring community and expert perceptions of the acceptability of an oropharyngeal gonorrhoea controlled human infection model in Australia

Euzebiusz Jamrozik, Louise Anne Keogh, Jane Simone Hocking, Deborah Anne Williamson, Christopher Kincaid Fairley, James McCarthy, Jacqueline Prestedge, Jessica E. Moulton, Eloise Williams, M. Y. Chen, S. Ruth
article en

Abstract

The development of an oropharyngeal gonorrhoea controlled human infection model (CHIM) could result in important translational outcomes, including accelerated development of new drugs and vaccines. Ethical study design for such a model requires community consultation, including assessment of the acceptability of the proposed CHIM among key stakeholders. This qualitative study involved: (i) semi-structured interviews and focus groups with individuals who would be eligible for participation in the proposed oropharyngeal gonorrhoea CHIM, defined as healthy men who have sex with men (MSM) aged 18-50 years living in Victoria (Australia); and, (ii) semi-structured interviews with gonorrhoea experts. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis supported by NVivo. Twenty-seven semi-structured interviews and one focus group were undertaken with 32 individuals between July and November, 2024, comprising 22 potential CHIM participants, and 10 experts. Overall, an oropharyngeal gonorrhoea CHIM was acceptable to most participants. Financial compensation and including only MSM who do not have sex with women were highlighted as key areas of debate. Participants highlighted that recruitment strategies should be sensitive to the stigma associated with gonorrhoea and history of stigma experienced by MSM. An oropharyngeal gonorrhoea CHIM is acceptable to key stakeholders but must be carefully designed to avoid exacerbation of stigma.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of St Andrews (GB), Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (AU), Coffs Harbour City Council (AU), University of Oxford (GB), Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory (AU), Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (AU), Peter Doherty Institute (AU), Alfred Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Wellcome Trust, University of Oxford, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Reproductive tract infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.