Are skull shape variations between sibling and cryptic species related to their habitat?

Abstract Geometric morphometric analyses were conducted to evaluate skull shape variation among three species of the Chaetodipus arenarius species complex (Rodentia: Heteromyidae), which are considered cryptic due to their morphological similarity. Chaetodipus siccus occurs allopatrically, whereas Chaetodipus arenarius and Chaetodipus ammophilus are sympatric in portions of their range. I tested the hypothesis that skull shape differs among the three species, each associated with a distinct habitat, and that these differences could be related to the types of seeds available in their respective environments. Specifically, I evaluated whether seed characteristics in each habitat correspond to differences in cranial morphospace and can be used to distinguish among species. My results revealed distinct skull shapes among the three species. Each species exhibited a specific cranial morphotype, with the most notable differences occurring in three main regions: the zygomatic arch, the temporal region, and the supraoccipital area—structures associated with the attachment of masticatory muscles. Variation in the position and size of these features likely reflects differences in muscle mass and development, which may be adaptations to the size and hardness of seeds consumed in each species’ habitat.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blaf124
Primary Topic
Morphological variations and asymmetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are skull shape variations between sibling and cryptic species related to their habitat?

Sergio Ticul Álvarez-Castañeda
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
Morphological variations and asymmetry
article

Are skull shape variations between sibling and cryptic species related to their habitat?

Sergio Ticul Álvarez-Castañeda
article en

Abstract

Abstract Geometric morphometric analyses were conducted to evaluate skull shape variation among three species of the Chaetodipus arenarius species complex (Rodentia: Heteromyidae), which are considered cryptic due to their morphological similarity. Chaetodipus siccus occurs allopatrically, whereas Chaetodipus arenarius and Chaetodipus ammophilus are sympatric in portions of their range. I tested the hypothesis that skull shape differs among the three species, each associated with a distinct habitat, and that these differences could be related to the types of seeds available in their respective environments. Specifically, I evaluated whether seed characteristics in each habitat correspond to differences in cranial morphospace and can be used to distinguish among species. My results revealed distinct skull shapes among the three species. Each species exhibited a specific cranial morphotype, with the most notable differences occurring in three main regions: the zygomatic arch, the temporal region, and the supraoccipital area—structures associated with the attachment of masticatory muscles. Variation in the position and size of these features likely reflects differences in muscle mass and development, which may be adaptations to the size and hardness of seeds consumed in each species’ habitat.

Biological Journal of the Linnean SocietyVol. 146(4)
Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas (ES), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Morphological variations and asymmetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.