Development of an Internet of Things–based real-time greenhouse gas and weather monitoring system for precision dairy farming

The environmental footprint of dairy production is one of the most pressing challenges faced by the industry globally. Our study aimed to develop and validate a cost-effective sensing solution for real-time monitoring of dairy farms' GHG emissions and microclimatic conditions. Each of the integrated sensing nodes was equipped with carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) gas sensors, along with an all-in-one weather sensor. Sensing nodes were validated against gold-standard measurements using open-circuit respiration chambers with individual cows under controlled conditions. The CH<sub>4</sub> emissions (133.0 ± 22.5 ppm, mean ± SD) showed an overall correlation (r = 0.46) with the gold-standard respiration chamber (166.0 ± 32.8 ppm) across all 3 d. However, the correlation changed over time, with a strong correlation on d 1 (r = 0.62), a moderate correlation on d 2 (r = 0.35), and a weak correlation on d 3 (r = 0.11). In contrast, sensor node quantified CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (905 ± 779 ppm) showed a weaker correlation (r = 0.019, 2,461 ± 346 ppm), indicating the need for further improvements to the sensing node. A wireless network of calibrated sensing nodes was deployed in 3 different locations within a dairy farm: dry cow pen (DCP), feed bunk (FB), and freestall beds (FSB) at a research dairy farm. The CH<sub>4</sub> emissions were greater in the DCP (12.5 ± 6.65 ppm) compared with FB (2.80 ± 0.61 ppm) and FSB (2.34 ± 0.62 ppm). The CO<sub>2</sub> emissions at the FB were greater (1,498 ± 1,020 ppm) compared with the DCP (534 ± 222 ppm) and FSB (724 ± 517 ppm). The NH<sub>3</sub> emissions were highest in the FSB (4.24 ± 0.91 ppm) compared with DCP (2.93 ± 1.35 ppm) and FB (1.10 ± 0.44 ppm). The differences in GHG emissions across the different areas of the dairy farm may be influenced by ambient temperature, humidity, housing conditions, and manure management practices. Our sensing nodes may provide a low-cost, scalable sensing network that can offer a practical solution for continuous GHG monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JDS Communications
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2025-0862
Primary Topic
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of an Internet of Things–based real-time greenhouse gas and weather monitoring system for precision dairy farming

Lav R. Khot, Diego A. Ceballos, Marina Madureira Ferreira, Keshawa M. Dadallage et al.
JDS Communications
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
article

Development of an Internet of Things–based real-time greenhouse gas and weather monitoring system for precision dairy farming

Lav R. Khot, Diego A. Ceballos, Marina Madureira Ferreira, Keshawa M. Dadallage, Alejandra Zapata-Salazar, Francisco A. Leal Yepes
article en

Abstract

The environmental footprint of dairy production is one of the most pressing challenges faced by the industry globally. Our study aimed to develop and validate a cost-effective sensing solution for real-time monitoring of dairy farms' GHG emissions and microclimatic conditions. Each of the integrated sensing nodes was equipped with carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) gas sensors, along with an all-in-one weather sensor. Sensing nodes were validated against gold-standard measurements using open-circuit respiration chambers with individual cows under controlled conditions. The CH<sub>4</sub> emissions (133.0 ± 22.5 ppm, mean ± SD) showed an overall correlation (r = 0.46) with the gold-standard respiration chamber (166.0 ± 32.8 ppm) across all 3 d. However, the correlation changed over time, with a strong correlation on d 1 (r = 0.62), a moderate correlation on d 2 (r = 0.35), and a weak correlation on d 3 (r = 0.11). In contrast, sensor node quantified CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (905 ± 779 ppm) showed a weaker correlation (r = 0.019, 2,461 ± 346 ppm), indicating the need for further improvements to the sensing node. A wireless network of calibrated sensing nodes was deployed in 3 different locations within a dairy farm: dry cow pen (DCP), feed bunk (FB), and freestall beds (FSB) at a research dairy farm. The CH<sub>4</sub> emissions were greater in the DCP (12.5 ± 6.65 ppm) compared with FB (2.80 ± 0.61 ppm) and FSB (2.34 ± 0.62 ppm). The CO<sub>2</sub> emissions at the FB were greater (1,498 ± 1,020 ppm) compared with the DCP (534 ± 222 ppm) and FSB (724 ± 517 ppm). The NH<sub>3</sub> emissions were highest in the FSB (4.24 ± 0.91 ppm) compared with DCP (2.93 ± 1.35 ppm) and FB (1.10 ± 0.44 ppm). The differences in GHG emissions across the different areas of the dairy farm may be influenced by ambient temperature, humidity, housing conditions, and manure management practices. Our sensing nodes may provide a low-cost, scalable sensing network that can offer a practical solution for continuous GHG monitoring.

JDS CommunicationsVol. 7(2)
Cornell University (US), New York State College of Veterinary Medicine (US), Washington State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.