Combining Participatory-Action-Research With Single-Case-Experimental-Designs: A New Promise for a Mixed-Methods Approach

Evidence-based practice involves using clinical reasoning to integrate information from four sources: research evidence, the expertise of the clinician, the client’s values and perspectives, and the practice context. As such, research conducted to inform practice should adopt processes to collect data to inform all four sources. In this paper, we propose an approach to do so, which combines the qualitative Participatory-Action-Research approach - which privileges community voices - with a quantitative Single-Case-Experimental-Design approach - which systematically captures individual differences and change over time. Since both focus on individual change, both hold promise for a new complementary mixed-methods approach for clinical practice. A critical analysis of our own paediatric Single-Case-Experimental-Design study (Calder et al., 2020), including reflections on how Participatory-Action-Research principles could have been implemented from the start, leads into key recommendations about how community perspectives can be meaningfully integrated into clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Participatory Research Methods
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.146371
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining Participatory-Action-Research With Single-Case-Experimental-Designs: A New Promise for a Mixed-Methods Approach

Suze Leitão, Britta Biedermann, Samuel David Calder, Helen Lette
1 citations
Journal of Participatory Research Methods
Health Policy Implementation Science
2.82
article

Combining Participatory-Action-Research With Single-Case-Experimental-Designs: A New Promise for a Mixed-Methods Approach

Suze Leitão, Britta Biedermann, Samuel David Calder, Helen Lette
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Evidence-based practice involves using clinical reasoning to integrate information from four sources: research evidence, the expertise of the clinician, the client’s values and perspectives, and the practice context. As such, research conducted to inform practice should adopt processes to collect data to inform all four sources. In this paper, we propose an approach to do so, which combines the qualitative Participatory-Action-Research approach - which privileges community voices - with a quantitative Single-Case-Experimental-Design approach - which systematically captures individual differences and change over time. Since both focus on individual change, both hold promise for a new complementary mixed-methods approach for clinical practice. A critical analysis of our own paediatric Single-Case-Experimental-Design study (Calder et al., 2020), including reflections on how Participatory-Action-Research principles could have been implemented from the start, leads into key recommendations about how community perspectives can be meaningfully integrated into clinical practice.

Journal of Participatory Research MethodsVol. 6(4)
University of Tasmania (AU), Curtin University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health Policy Implementation Science
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.