Structural analysis and certification

This paper contains personal contributions discussed in a collaborative working group ICAO-IFAR DiTAC Action “Digital Transformation in Aircraft Certification” in order to highlight that the certification requirements are satisfied in a structural analysis process. Compliance with CS-25 when using FEM is demonstrated through engineering justification, correlation with test results (when available), application of appropriate safety margins, and documentation of all modelling assumptions and boundary conditions. Each analysis must provide evidence that the structural behavior meets the regulatory criteria under all applicable loading conditions. Performed structural analyses are verified for compliance with applicable EASA certification requirements, in this case, CS-25. It is described that there is no direct correspondence between CS-25 certification requirements and the FEM modelling process, since the regulation defines safety objectives, not recommending specific analysis methodologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INCAS BULLETIN
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2025.17.4.23
Primary Topic
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural analysis and certification

A. Gaz, Cristian MOISEI, Octavian NISTOR, Irina MIU
INCAS BULLETIN
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
article

Structural analysis and certification

A. Gaz, Cristian MOISEI, Octavian NISTOR, Irina MIU
article en

Abstract

This paper contains personal contributions discussed in a collaborative working group ICAO-IFAR DiTAC Action “Digital Transformation in Aircraft Certification” in order to highlight that the certification requirements are satisfied in a structural analysis process. Compliance with CS-25 when using FEM is demonstrated through engineering justification, correlation with test results (when available), application of appropriate safety margins, and documentation of all modelling assumptions and boundary conditions. Each analysis must provide evidence that the structural behavior meets the regulatory criteria under all applicable loading conditions. Performed structural analyses are verified for compliance with applicable EASA certification requirements, in this case, CS-25. It is described that there is no direct correspondence between CS-25 certification requirements and the FEM modelling process, since the regulation defines safety objectives, not recommending specific analysis methodologies.

INCAS BULLETIN
National Institute for Aerospace Research Elie Carafoli (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Structural analysis and certification — A. Gaz, Cristian MOISEI, et al. · INCAS BULLETIN (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS