Absence of Hofmeister Selectivity in Hydrophobic Ion-Exchanger Nanopores

Dehydration governs ion selectivity in both natural ion channels and synthetic ion sieves, as ions must dehydrate to traverse subnanometer pores. Because lipophilic ions experience lower dehydration energy costs, an intrinsic lipophilic selectivity pattern known as the Hofmeister series arises. This Hofmeister selectivity is modulated in natural ion channels by electrostatic and coordinative interactions between ions and nanopore surfaces, yielding diverse selectivities. Ion selectivity has also been demonstrated in larger synthetic nanopores─up to 5 nm in diameter─functionalized with ionophores that enhance specific coordinative interactions. In these synthetic ion channels, surface hydrophobicity is critical for ion selectivity; however, its exact role remains undetermined. Here, we elucidate the contribution of hydrophobicity by comparing structurally identical hydrophilic and hydrophobic cation-exchanger gold nanopores modified with 10-mercaptodecane-1-sulfonate, a ligand lacking strong ion-coordinating functionalities. Zero-current potentiometry revealed that cation-exchanger nanopores do not discriminate among singly charged cations, except for a modest preference for H<sup>+</sup>. Remarkably, this behavior was observed in both hydrophilic and nanometer-wide hydrophobic nanopores, contrasting with the strong Hofmeister selectivity of subnanometer pores and hydrophobic bulk polymer membranes. The absence of Hofmeister selectivity was confirmed in both multipore membranes and single nanopores, ruling out ensemble nonidealities as an explanation. These findings indicate that surface hydrophobicity alone does not impart lipophilicity-driven discrimination to cation-exchanger nanopores. The lack of intrinsic Hofmeister selectivity may enable unique ion-sensing applications (e.g., total ion concentration measurements, ligand-tuned ion-selective sensors) by minimizing interference from lipophilic species that commonly affect polymer-based sensing membranes, while still excluding bulk electrolyte from the pores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c05239
Primary Topic
Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Absence of Hofmeister Selectivity in Hydrophobic Ion-Exchanger Nanopores

Róbert E. Gyurcsányi, Péter Fürjes, Gergely T. Solymosi, Tünde Kis
Analytical Chemistry
Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
article

Absence of Hofmeister Selectivity in Hydrophobic Ion-Exchanger Nanopores

Róbert E. Gyurcsányi, Péter Fürjes, Gergely T. Solymosi, Tünde Kis
article en

Abstract

Dehydration governs ion selectivity in both natural ion channels and synthetic ion sieves, as ions must dehydrate to traverse subnanometer pores. Because lipophilic ions experience lower dehydration energy costs, an intrinsic lipophilic selectivity pattern known as the Hofmeister series arises. This Hofmeister selectivity is modulated in natural ion channels by electrostatic and coordinative interactions between ions and nanopore surfaces, yielding diverse selectivities. Ion selectivity has also been demonstrated in larger synthetic nanopores─up to 5 nm in diameter─functionalized with ionophores that enhance specific coordinative interactions. In these synthetic ion channels, surface hydrophobicity is critical for ion selectivity; however, its exact role remains undetermined. Here, we elucidate the contribution of hydrophobicity by comparing structurally identical hydrophilic and hydrophobic cation-exchanger gold nanopores modified with 10-mercaptodecane-1-sulfonate, a ligand lacking strong ion-coordinating functionalities. Zero-current potentiometry revealed that cation-exchanger nanopores do not discriminate among singly charged cations, except for a modest preference for H<sup>+</sup>. Remarkably, this behavior was observed in both hydrophilic and nanometer-wide hydrophobic nanopores, contrasting with the strong Hofmeister selectivity of subnanometer pores and hydrophobic bulk polymer membranes. The absence of Hofmeister selectivity was confirmed in both multipore membranes and single nanopores, ruling out ensemble nonidealities as an explanation. These findings indicate that surface hydrophobicity alone does not impart lipophilicity-driven discrimination to cation-exchanger nanopores. The lack of intrinsic Hofmeister selectivity may enable unique ion-sensing applications (e.g., total ion concentration measurements, ligand-tuned ion-selective sensors) by minimizing interference from lipophilic species that commonly affect polymer-based sensing membranes, while still excluding bulk electrolyte from the pores.

Analytical ChemistryVol. 97(49)
Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU), HUN-REN Centre for Energy Research (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.