Biomechanical and neuromuscular differences between professional and varsity football players during countermovement and approach jumps

This study aimed to compare lower-body kinematics, muscle activity, performance, and vertical ground reaction force (GRFz) metrics between professional and varsity Ecuadorian football players during countermovement jumps with arm swing (CMJAS) and approach jumps (AJ). These two jump types were selected because they closely reflect common football-specific movement patterns; CMJAS simulates vertical jumps with arm drive, while AJ mimics explosive jumping after a run-up. Forty athletes (20 professional, 20 varsity; equally distributed by sex) were assessed using synchronized motion capture, force plates, and surface electromyography. Professional males demonstrated greater force production efficiency, defined here as the ability to generate higher concentric average GRFz, higher braking peak GRFz, shorter movement durations, and higher rates of force development in the unloading, yielding and braking phases, while achieving similar jump heights and modified reactive strength index (RSI mod) to varsity players during CMJAS. However, they also experienced higher impact forces in the AJ. Among females, professionals outperformed varsity players in both jumps, achieving greater jump heights, higher RSI mod scores, and increased concentric average GRFz. They also exhibited higher landing impact forces, loading rates, and asymmetric vastus medialis mean activation during landing; patterns commonly associated with elevated injury risk. Across groups, joint range of motion (ROM) and muscle activation patterns varied by phase, with professionals generally showing more proximal muscle activation and neuromuscular control. Asymmetries in ROM and muscle activation were more pronounced among professional females, particularly during AJ, suggesting task-specific adaptations that may also influence injury susceptibility. These findings underscore the importance of a comprehensive biomechanical assessment to inform injury screening and targeted strategies for injury risk reduction in competitive football.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336672
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomechanical and neuromuscular differences between professional and varsity football players during countermovement and approach jumps

R. Argothy Bucheli, Paul Arauz, Angelo Fierro, Alejandra de‐la‐Torre et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Sports injuries and prevention
1.72
article

Biomechanical and neuromuscular differences between professional and varsity football players during countermovement and approach jumps

R. Argothy Bucheli, Paul Arauz, Angelo Fierro, Alejandra de‐la‐Torre, Julián Fernández-Martín, Gabriela García, J Castillo, Wendy Montiel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to compare lower-body kinematics, muscle activity, performance, and vertical ground reaction force (GRFz) metrics between professional and varsity Ecuadorian football players during countermovement jumps with arm swing (CMJAS) and approach jumps (AJ). These two jump types were selected because they closely reflect common football-specific movement patterns; CMJAS simulates vertical jumps with arm drive, while AJ mimics explosive jumping after a run-up. Forty athletes (20 professional, 20 varsity; equally distributed by sex) were assessed using synchronized motion capture, force plates, and surface electromyography. Professional males demonstrated greater force production efficiency, defined here as the ability to generate higher concentric average GRFz, higher braking peak GRFz, shorter movement durations, and higher rates of force development in the unloading, yielding and braking phases, while achieving similar jump heights and modified reactive strength index (RSI mod) to varsity players during CMJAS. However, they also experienced higher impact forces in the AJ. Among females, professionals outperformed varsity players in both jumps, achieving greater jump heights, higher RSI mod scores, and increased concentric average GRFz. They also exhibited higher landing impact forces, loading rates, and asymmetric vastus medialis mean activation during landing; patterns commonly associated with elevated injury risk. Across groups, joint range of motion (ROM) and muscle activation patterns varied by phase, with professionals generally showing more proximal muscle activation and neuromuscular control. Asymmetries in ROM and muscle activation were more pronounced among professional females, particularly during AJ, suggesting task-specific adaptations that may also influence injury susceptibility. These findings underscore the importance of a comprehensive biomechanical assessment to inform injury screening and targeted strategies for injury risk reduction in competitive football.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(12)
Stony Brook School (US), National Archives of Ecuador (EC), Universidad San Francisco de Quito (EC)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Sports injuries and prevention
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.