MRI Study of Kidney Blood Flow and Oxygenation in Heart Failure with Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background: The pathophysiology of CKD in HFpEF has not been fully elucidated. It is unclear whether kidney cortical and medullary blood flow is altered in HFpEF compared to HFrEF. Methods: We recruited 19 HFpEF and 10 HFrEF participants as well as 5 CKD (eGFR < 60) and 3 healthy volunteer controls. HFpEF and HFrEF diagnoses were confirmed by EHR review including ejection fraction from echocardiographs and clinical assessments. All participants underwent a standardized study visit (including blood draws) and research kidney MRI protocols with a Siemens 3T scanner. Dynamic contrast enhanced imaging (DCE) for measuring kidney cortical and medullary blood flow as well as blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) sequences were done. Results: As summarized in Table, HFrEF group had lower SBP, higher serum renin and renin/aldosterone ratio compared to HFpEF participants and controls indicating greater RAAS activation in HFrEF. Cortical and medullary blood flow seems consistent across controls and HFpEF, however, HFrEF had lower cortical and medullary blood flow rates. The ratio of cortical to medullary blood flow were similar across groups. Furthermore, tissue oxygenation indicated by T2* values were similar across groups. Conclusion: Reduced cortical and medullary blood flow with evidence of RAAS activation were present in HFrEF but not HFpEF. Reduced kidney blood flow might not be the cause of kidney dysfunction in HFpEF. - Healthy ControlN=3 CKD ControlN=5 HFrEFN=10 HFpEFN=19 Age, years 32 ± 9 76 ± 4 66 ± 16 68 ± 9 Female 1 (33) 3 (60) 5 (50) 11 (58) White Race 2 (67) 4 (80) 7 (70) 19 (100) BMI 29.3 ± 5.2 31.7 ± 6.0 30.6 ± 9.3 36.1 ± 7.1 eGFR 89 ± 25 40 ± 8 65 ± 20 59 ± 16 SBP, mmHg 119 ± 7 130 ± 13 102 ± 15 118 ± 20 Serum Aldosterone, ng/dL 10.0 ± 4.4 17.4 ± 10.5 21.0 ± 14.1 32.7 ± 21.4 Serum Renin, pg /dL ND 14.9 ± 16.7 241.0 ± 346.2 105.0 ± 146.9 Renin/Aldo ratio ND 1.4 ± 2.0 18.6 ± 26.8 3.7 ± 5.1 Cortical blood flow, mL blood/mL tissue/second 0.061 ± 0.0035 0.061 ± 0.0085 0.039 ± 0.0120 0.061 ± 0.0173 Medullary blood flow, mL blood/mL tissue/second 0.020 ± 0.001 0.0225 ± 0.0064 0.014 ± 0.0046 0.020 ± 0.0053 Cortex / Medulla QB ratio 3.11 ± 0.01 2.77 ± 0.37 2.81 ± 0.42 3.05 ± 0.59 T2* cortex, ms 66 ± 2.7 68.5 ± 8.2 69.5 ± 3.6 70.5 ± 6 T2* medulla, ms 42 ± 3.4 40 ± 2.7 43.5 ± 3.8 43.5 ± 3.8 Note. Renin was not done (ND) for Healthy Controls

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2025xdg06sce
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MRI Study of Kidney Blood Flow and Oxygenation in Heart Failure with Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction

James C. Fang, Alfred K. Cheung, Stavros G. Drakos, Sydney E. Hartsell et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

MRI Study of Kidney Blood Flow and Oxygenation in Heart Failure with Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction

James C. Fang, Alfred K. Cheung, Stavros G. Drakos, Sydney E. Hartsell, Robert E. Boucher, Srinivasan Beddhu, Glen Morrell, Amara Sarwal, P Veeresh Babu, George Bissada, Nirupama Ramkumar, Akhil Ramanujam Chakravartula, Ana Umbacia
article en

Abstract

Background: The pathophysiology of CKD in HFpEF has not been fully elucidated. It is unclear whether kidney cortical and medullary blood flow is altered in HFpEF compared to HFrEF. Methods: We recruited 19 HFpEF and 10 HFrEF participants as well as 5 CKD (eGFR < 60) and 3 healthy volunteer controls. HFpEF and HFrEF diagnoses were confirmed by EHR review including ejection fraction from echocardiographs and clinical assessments. All participants underwent a standardized study visit (including blood draws) and research kidney MRI protocols with a Siemens 3T scanner. Dynamic contrast enhanced imaging (DCE) for measuring kidney cortical and medullary blood flow as well as blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) sequences were done. Results: As summarized in Table, HFrEF group had lower SBP, higher serum renin and renin/aldosterone ratio compared to HFpEF participants and controls indicating greater RAAS activation in HFrEF. Cortical and medullary blood flow seems consistent across controls and HFpEF, however, HFrEF had lower cortical and medullary blood flow rates. The ratio of cortical to medullary blood flow were similar across groups. Furthermore, tissue oxygenation indicated by T2* values were similar across groups. Conclusion: Reduced cortical and medullary blood flow with evidence of RAAS activation were present in HFrEF but not HFpEF. Reduced kidney blood flow might not be the cause of kidney dysfunction in HFpEF. - Healthy ControlN=3 CKD ControlN=5 HFrEFN=10 HFpEFN=19 Age, years 32 ± 9 76 ± 4 66 ± 16 68 ± 9 Female 1 (33) 3 (60) 5 (50) 11 (58) White Race 2 (67) 4 (80) 7 (70) 19 (100) BMI 29.3 ± 5.2 31.7 ± 6.0 30.6 ± 9.3 36.1 ± 7.1 eGFR 89 ± 25 40 ± 8 65 ± 20 59 ± 16 SBP, mmHg 119 ± 7 130 ± 13 102 ± 15 118 ± 20 Serum Aldosterone, ng/dL 10.0 ± 4.4 17.4 ± 10.5 21.0 ± 14.1 32.7 ± 21.4 Serum Renin, pg /dL ND 14.9 ± 16.7 241.0 ± 346.2 105.0 ± 146.9 Renin/Aldo ratio ND 1.4 ± 2.0 18.6 ± 26.8 3.7 ± 5.1 Cortical blood flow, mL blood/mL tissue/second 0.061 ± 0.0035 0.061 ± 0.0085 0.039 ± 0.0120 0.061 ± 0.0173 Medullary blood flow, mL blood/mL tissue/second 0.020 ± 0.001 0.0225 ± 0.0064 0.014 ± 0.0046 0.020 ± 0.0053 Cortex / Medulla QB ratio 3.11 ± 0.01 2.77 ± 0.37 2.81 ± 0.42 3.05 ± 0.59 T2* cortex, ms 66 ± 2.7 68.5 ± 8.2 69.5 ± 3.6 70.5 ± 6 T2* medulla, ms 42 ± 3.4 40 ± 2.7 43.5 ± 3.8 43.5 ± 3.8 Note. Renin was not done (ND) for Healthy Controls

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
University of Utah (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.