Long-term outcomes of non-surgical treatment in first-time anterior shoulder dislocation: Does immobilisation duration and rehabilitation timing affect functional results and recurrence rates?

ObjectiveTo investigate whether immobilisation duration and rehabilitation initiation influence functional recovery, recurrence, and treatment failure in first-time anterior shoulder dislocation managed conservatively.DesignRetrospective multicentre cohort study.SettingOrthopaedic departments of multiple hospitals, data were collected between 2015 and 2021.ParticipantsA total of two hundred and one patients with first-time anterior shoulder dislocation were managed non-surgically. Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 (early mobilisation; <i>n</i> = 61) - one to two weeks of immobilisation with rehabilitation starting in week two; Group 2 (standard protocol; <i>n</i> = 76) - three to four weeks of immobilisation with rehabilitation starting in week four; and Group 3 (delayed rehabilitation; <i>n</i> = 64) - more than four weeks of immobilisation with rehabilitation starting in week six.InterventionNon-surgical treatment with varying immobilisation durations followed by rehabilitation.Main MeasuresFunctional outcomes were the Rowe, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Scores. Clinical outcomes included shoulder range of motion, recurrence, return-to-activity time, and treatment failure.ResultsFunctional scores and range of motion did not differ significantly between groups. Recurrence occurred in 18.0% (Group 1), 23.7% (Group 2), and 23.4% (Group 3), with no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = .135). However, treatment failure - defined as persistent instability or the need for surgical stabilisation - was significantly higher in Group 3 (23.4%) compared with Group 1 (16.4%) and Group 2 (18.4%) (<i>p</i> = .022). Mean follow-up was 42.1 ± 10.2 months.ConclusionsImmobilisation duration and rehabilitation timing were not associated with statistically significant differences in functional recovery or recurrence. Prolonged immobilisation appeared to increase the risk of treatment failure. Early or standard protocols may therefore represent reasonable options, and prospective randomised studies are needed to define optimal management.Level of Evidence: Level Three.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251400260
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term outcomes of non-surgical treatment in first-time anterior shoulder dislocation: Does immobilisation duration and rehabilitation timing affect functional results and recurrence rates?

Yusuf Yahşi, Rodi Ertoğrul, Süleyman Çakirtürk, Yusuf Sülek
Clinical Rehabilitation
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Long-term outcomes of non-surgical treatment in first-time anterior shoulder dislocation: Does immobilisation duration and rehabilitation timing affect functional results and recurrence rates?

Yusuf Yahşi, Rodi Ertoğrul, Süleyman Çakirtürk, Yusuf Sülek
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate whether immobilisation duration and rehabilitation initiation influence functional recovery, recurrence, and treatment failure in first-time anterior shoulder dislocation managed conservatively.DesignRetrospective multicentre cohort study.SettingOrthopaedic departments of multiple hospitals, data were collected between 2015 and 2021.ParticipantsA total of two hundred and one patients with first-time anterior shoulder dislocation were managed non-surgically. Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 (early mobilisation; <i>n</i> = 61) - one to two weeks of immobilisation with rehabilitation starting in week two; Group 2 (standard protocol; <i>n</i> = 76) - three to four weeks of immobilisation with rehabilitation starting in week four; and Group 3 (delayed rehabilitation; <i>n</i> = 64) - more than four weeks of immobilisation with rehabilitation starting in week six.InterventionNon-surgical treatment with varying immobilisation durations followed by rehabilitation.Main MeasuresFunctional outcomes were the Rowe, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Scores. Clinical outcomes included shoulder range of motion, recurrence, return-to-activity time, and treatment failure.ResultsFunctional scores and range of motion did not differ significantly between groups. Recurrence occurred in 18.0% (Group 1), 23.7% (Group 2), and 23.4% (Group 3), with no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = .135). However, treatment failure - defined as persistent instability or the need for surgical stabilisation - was significantly higher in Group 3 (23.4%) compared with Group 1 (16.4%) and Group 2 (18.4%) (<i>p</i> = .022). Mean follow-up was 42.1 ± 10.2 months.ConclusionsImmobilisation duration and rehabilitation timing were not associated with statistically significant differences in functional recovery or recurrence. Prolonged immobilisation appeared to increase the risk of treatment failure. Early or standard protocols may therefore represent reasonable options, and prospective randomised studies are needed to define optimal management.Level of Evidence: Level Three.

Clinical RehabilitationVol. 40(4)
State Hospital (GB), Istanbul Medipol University (TR), Afyon Kocatepe University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.