Renoprotective Effects of Pemafibrate in Patients with CKD: An Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled Trial (PROFIT-CKD Study)

Background: Patients with elevated serum triglyceride (TG) levels are more likely to progress chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, it remains unclear whether lowering serum TG levels confers renoprotective benefits. This study aims to evaluate the renoprotective effect of Pemafibrate, a selective PPARα agonist, in patients with CKD. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial, 145 non-dialysis CKD patients with hypertriglyceridemia (fasting serum TG 150 mg/dL and over) were assigned to either a Pemafibrate treatment group or a conventional therapy group for a 12-month intervention. In the conventional therapy group, neither placebo nor control drugs were used. The primary outcome was the change in the spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) from baseline, analyzed using a mixed-effects model. Results: After obtaining informed consent, 73 patients were allocated to the Pemafibrate group and 72 to the conventional therapy group. The between-group least squares mean difference in the change in log-transformed UPCR at 12 months was 0.22 (95% CI: -0.05 to 0.49), showing no statistically significant difference (P = 0.11). Among the secondary outcomes, liver and biliary enzymes and lipid metabolism markers significantly improved in the Pemafibrate group, while kidney function and inflammatory markers did not differ significantly between groups. In an exploratory subgroup analysis, among subgroups with diabetic nephropathy, the decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly attenuated in the Pemafibrate group compared to the conventional group (least squares mean difference: 6.2; P = 0.02). Notably, this effect was similarly observed in the obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) subgroup of patients with diabetic nephropathy (least squares mean difference: 7.2; P = 0.02), but not in the group without obesity (least squares mean difference: 0.15; P = 0.95). Conclusion: In non-dialysis CKD patients, Pemafibrate treatment did not significantly alter proteinuria compared to conventional therapy; however, it may be beneficial in patients with diabetes nephropathy, especially with obesity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2025w5pw4999
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Renoprotective Effects of Pemafibrate in Patients with CKD: An Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled Trial (PROFIT-CKD Study)

Tetsuro Ago, Mai Seki, Toshiaki Nakano
1 citations
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
1.43
article

Renoprotective Effects of Pemafibrate in Patients with CKD: An Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled Trial (PROFIT-CKD Study)

Tetsuro Ago, Mai Seki, Toshiaki Nakano
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Patients with elevated serum triglyceride (TG) levels are more likely to progress chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, it remains unclear whether lowering serum TG levels confers renoprotective benefits. This study aims to evaluate the renoprotective effect of Pemafibrate, a selective PPARα agonist, in patients with CKD. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial, 145 non-dialysis CKD patients with hypertriglyceridemia (fasting serum TG 150 mg/dL and over) were assigned to either a Pemafibrate treatment group or a conventional therapy group for a 12-month intervention. In the conventional therapy group, neither placebo nor control drugs were used. The primary outcome was the change in the spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) from baseline, analyzed using a mixed-effects model. Results: After obtaining informed consent, 73 patients were allocated to the Pemafibrate group and 72 to the conventional therapy group. The between-group least squares mean difference in the change in log-transformed UPCR at 12 months was 0.22 (95% CI: -0.05 to 0.49), showing no statistically significant difference (P = 0.11). Among the secondary outcomes, liver and biliary enzymes and lipid metabolism markers significantly improved in the Pemafibrate group, while kidney function and inflammatory markers did not differ significantly between groups. In an exploratory subgroup analysis, among subgroups with diabetic nephropathy, the decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly attenuated in the Pemafibrate group compared to the conventional group (least squares mean difference: 6.2; P = 0.02). Notably, this effect was similarly observed in the obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) subgroup of patients with diabetic nephropathy (least squares mean difference: 7.2; P = 0.02), but not in the group without obesity (least squares mean difference: 0.15; P = 0.95). Conclusion: In non-dialysis CKD patients, Pemafibrate treatment did not significantly alter proteinuria compared to conventional therapy; however, it may be beneficial in patients with diabetes nephropathy, especially with obesity.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
Seinan Gakuin University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.