Differences in spring green up date and climate sensitivities of forest and grassland ecosystems across China

The spring green up date (GUD) is highly sensitive to climate change and serves as a key indicator of ecosystem change. With the rapid advancement of satellite sensor technology, an increasing number of vegetation indices have been employed to derive GUD. Although these developments have broadened the avenues for obtaining GUD, they have also introduced retrieval uncertainties, resulting in discrepancies in analyses of its long-term trends and driving factors. In this study, the GUD for forests and grasslands was derived from both normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), and the differences in GUD – as well as their sensitivities to dominant preseason climatic factors – were comparatively analyzed. We found that although forest and grassland GUDs across China advanced significantly from 2001 to 2023, the GUD derived from SIF (S_GUD) exhibited an even faster rate of advancement, particularly in forested areas. Preseason total precipitation (Ptot) and preseason mean temperature (Tmp) dominated the variation in forest GUD, whereas preseason total evaporation (Evap) and Ptot together governed grassland GUD; the resulting sensitivities displayed pronounced spatial heterogeneity. In addition, the magnitude and spatial continuity of S_GUD’s sensitivity to dominant preseason climatic factors were generally higher than those of GUD derived from NDVI (M_GUD), indicating that SIF captures vegetation responses to meteorological drivers more directly and sensitively. Our study quantified the distinct mechanisms by which forest and grassland GUDs – derived from NDVI and SIF – respond to climate change, thereby offering a valuable reference for subsequent quantitative phenological analyses and for predicting vegetation distributions under future climate scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geo-spatial Information Science
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2025.2586390
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in spring green up date and climate sensitivities of forest and grassland ecosystems across China

C Chen, Li Yan, Jianjun Chen, Hong Xie et al.
1 citations
Geo-spatial Information Science
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.72
article

Differences in spring green up date and climate sensitivities of forest and grassland ecosystems across China

C Chen, Li Yan, Jianjun Chen, Hong Xie, Zihao Feng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The spring green up date (GUD) is highly sensitive to climate change and serves as a key indicator of ecosystem change. With the rapid advancement of satellite sensor technology, an increasing number of vegetation indices have been employed to derive GUD. Although these developments have broadened the avenues for obtaining GUD, they have also introduced retrieval uncertainties, resulting in discrepancies in analyses of its long-term trends and driving factors. In this study, the GUD for forests and grasslands was derived from both normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), and the differences in GUD – as well as their sensitivities to dominant preseason climatic factors – were comparatively analyzed. We found that although forest and grassland GUDs across China advanced significantly from 2001 to 2023, the GUD derived from SIF (S_GUD) exhibited an even faster rate of advancement, particularly in forested areas. Preseason total precipitation (Ptot) and preseason mean temperature (Tmp) dominated the variation in forest GUD, whereas preseason total evaporation (Evap) and Ptot together governed grassland GUD; the resulting sensitivities displayed pronounced spatial heterogeneity. In addition, the magnitude and spatial continuity of S_GUD’s sensitivity to dominant preseason climatic factors were generally higher than those of GUD derived from NDVI (M_GUD), indicating that SIF captures vegetation responses to meteorological drivers more directly and sensitively. Our study quantified the distinct mechanisms by which forest and grassland GUDs – derived from NDVI and SIF – respond to climate change, thereby offering a valuable reference for subsequent quantitative phenological analyses and for predicting vegetation distributions under future climate scenarios.

Geo-spatial Information Science
Wuhan University (CN), Guilin University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.