Pioglitazone modulates metabolic adaptation and peripheral nerve regeneration after injury

Peripheral nerves have an intrinsic capacity for regeneration after traumatic injury, with Schwann cells (SCs) playing a central role in orchestrating this complex process. Critical components of successful regeneration include SC reprogramming into repair SCs, debris removal and metabolic adaptations. Up to now, there are no pharmacological treatments available in the clinics to improve nerve regeneration. In this study, we investigated peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARɣ) as a therapeutic target in the context of nerve regeneration, since we previously found this transcription factor to be involved in SC reprograming and metabolic adaptations. Therefore, we used a mouse model of sciatic nerve crush injury and applied the PPARɣ agonist pioglitazone (PIO) in two different treatment paradigms: (i) acutely after injury (0-5 days post injury) and (ii) delayed (5-21 days post injury), thereby addressing different phases of regeneration. Our findings revealed that PIO treatment immediately following nerve injury (first treatment paradigm) disrupted SC transition into the repair phenotype and diminished the physiological inflammatory response. As a consequence, axonal and myelin debris clearance was delayed, ultimately resulting in impaired axonal outgrowth and nerve regeneration. In the second treatment paradigm (PIO administration starting five days after injury) SCs had already acquired the repair phenotype and immune cell infiltration had taken place when PIO administration started. There, PIO promoted axonal regeneration, enhanced remyelination, and improved functional recovery. Importantly, PIO treatment increased mitochondrial content in neurons and SCs. In addition, delayed application of PIO induced lipid metabolism, glycolysis and ATP production in SCs, leading to the assumption that improved metabolic conditions mediate enhanced nerve regeneration in this treatment paradigm. These findings show that depending on the timing of PIO treatment, PPARɣ can serve as a potential therapeutic agent to improve nerve regeneration by promoting key metabolic adaptations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Neurodegeneration
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-025-00913-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nerve injury and regeneration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pioglitazone modulates metabolic adaptation and peripheral nerve regeneration after injury

Daniel Tews, Pamela Fischer‐Posovszky, Christopher Meyer zu Reckendorf, Bernd Knöll et al.
2 citations
Molecular Neurodegeneration
Nerve injury and regeneration
1.82
article

Pioglitazone modulates metabolic adaptation and peripheral nerve regeneration after injury

Daniel Tews, Pamela Fischer‐Posovszky, Christopher Meyer zu Reckendorf, Bernd Knöll, Daniela Sinske, Angelika Seitz, Claudia Klugmann, Taylan Özöncü
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Peripheral nerves have an intrinsic capacity for regeneration after traumatic injury, with Schwann cells (SCs) playing a central role in orchestrating this complex process. Critical components of successful regeneration include SC reprogramming into repair SCs, debris removal and metabolic adaptations. Up to now, there are no pharmacological treatments available in the clinics to improve nerve regeneration. In this study, we investigated peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARɣ) as a therapeutic target in the context of nerve regeneration, since we previously found this transcription factor to be involved in SC reprograming and metabolic adaptations. Therefore, we used a mouse model of sciatic nerve crush injury and applied the PPARɣ agonist pioglitazone (PIO) in two different treatment paradigms: (i) acutely after injury (0-5 days post injury) and (ii) delayed (5-21 days post injury), thereby addressing different phases of regeneration. Our findings revealed that PIO treatment immediately following nerve injury (first treatment paradigm) disrupted SC transition into the repair phenotype and diminished the physiological inflammatory response. As a consequence, axonal and myelin debris clearance was delayed, ultimately resulting in impaired axonal outgrowth and nerve regeneration. In the second treatment paradigm (PIO administration starting five days after injury) SCs had already acquired the repair phenotype and immune cell infiltration had taken place when PIO administration started. There, PIO promoted axonal regeneration, enhanced remyelination, and improved functional recovery. Importantly, PIO treatment increased mitochondrial content in neurons and SCs. In addition, delayed application of PIO induced lipid metabolism, glycolysis and ATP production in SCs, leading to the assumption that improved metabolic conditions mediate enhanced nerve regeneration in this treatment paradigm. These findings show that depending on the timing of PIO treatment, PPARɣ can serve as a potential therapeutic agent to improve nerve regeneration by promoting key metabolic adaptations.

Molecular NeurodegenerationVol. 20(1)
Universität Ulm (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE)
Baden-Württemberg Stiftung, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Universität Ulm
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Nerve injury and regeneration
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.