Subjectivity in the storm: Q methodological deconstruction of climate narratives among Bangladesh's drought-affected farming households

Perception, given its pivotal role in the formulation of inclusive adaptation strategies to address climate change, has emerged as an area of mutual interest among international communities. Still, prior studies have predominantly excluded the heterogenous belief structures of stakeholders in suggesting relevant policy frameworks, especially in the Global South. However, this inquiry employed Q methodology to investigate the subjective views of 28 farmers from drought-affected districts in northwest Bangladesh on climate change, identifying three distinct viewpoints: factivists, traditionalists, and modulators. Factivists based their arguments on scientific evidence and acknowledged the necessity of effective adaptation strategies against climate change. Conversely, traditionalists rejected empirical adaptation strategies and scientific reasoning, viewing climate change as a divine act. Modulators prioritized experience-based adaptation techniques, regardless of some underlying causes of climate change. However, all three groups acknowledge extreme climate events are increasing in frequency and causing a sharp decline in crop productivity, notwithstanding their ideological differences. Findings of this investigation articulated the necessity of consolidating diverse beliefs of the farmers to form a feasible and potent set of policies and supported holistic adaptation strategies that resonate with—and are adopted by—the full spectrum of rural stakeholders. • A three-pronged approach to understanding climate change perception: Factivists, traditionalists, modulators. • Factivists assert that the information is grounded in scientific evidence, while traditionalists view it as an act of God. • Modulators prioritize adaptation strategies that are practical and tailored to specific contexts. • All groups agree on the growth of extreme weather and its impact on crop productivity. • To develop effective climate adaptation strategies through policy, it is essential to incorporate diverse viewpoints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Disaster Science
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2025.100497
Primary Topic
Q Methodology Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subjectivity in the storm: Q methodological deconstruction of climate narratives among Bangladesh's drought-affected farming households

Bikash Chandra Ghosh, Hridoy Majumder
Progress in Disaster Science
Q Methodology Applications
article

Subjectivity in the storm: Q methodological deconstruction of climate narratives among Bangladesh's drought-affected farming households

Bikash Chandra Ghosh, Hridoy Majumder
article en

Abstract

Perception, given its pivotal role in the formulation of inclusive adaptation strategies to address climate change, has emerged as an area of mutual interest among international communities. Still, prior studies have predominantly excluded the heterogenous belief structures of stakeholders in suggesting relevant policy frameworks, especially in the Global South. However, this inquiry employed Q methodology to investigate the subjective views of 28 farmers from drought-affected districts in northwest Bangladesh on climate change, identifying three distinct viewpoints: factivists, traditionalists, and modulators. Factivists based their arguments on scientific evidence and acknowledged the necessity of effective adaptation strategies against climate change. Conversely, traditionalists rejected empirical adaptation strategies and scientific reasoning, viewing climate change as a divine act. Modulators prioritized experience-based adaptation techniques, regardless of some underlying causes of climate change. However, all three groups acknowledge extreme climate events are increasing in frequency and causing a sharp decline in crop productivity, notwithstanding their ideological differences. Findings of this investigation articulated the necessity of consolidating diverse beliefs of the farmers to form a feasible and potent set of policies and supported holistic adaptation strategies that resonate with—and are adopted by—the full spectrum of rural stakeholders. • A three-pronged approach to understanding climate change perception: Factivists, traditionalists, modulators. • Factivists assert that the information is grounded in scientific evidence, while traditionalists view it as an act of God. • Modulators prioritize adaptation strategies that are practical and tailored to specific contexts. • All groups agree on the growth of extreme weather and its impact on crop productivity. • To develop effective climate adaptation strategies through policy, it is essential to incorporate diverse viewpoints.

Progress in Disaster ScienceVol. 29
Pabna University of Science and Technology (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Q Methodology Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Subjectivity in the storm: Q methodological deconstruction of climate narratives among Bangladesh's drought-affected farming households — Bikash Chandra Ghosh, Hridoy Majumder · Progress in Disaster Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS