Correlation of intra- and postoperative best active contact and its implication for STN-DBS outcome

To assess the relationship between intraoperative test stimulation sites and postoperative best active contacts in STN-DBS for Parkinson’s disease and to evaluate whether intraoperative VTAs predict long-term outcome. We retrospectively analyzed 92 hemispheres in 46 patients undergoing bilateral STN-DBS. Coordinates of the best intraoperative stimulation point and the best active contact at one year postoperatively were compared using vector analysis. Corresponding VTAs were modeled and visualized in normalized MNI space using Guide XT and MATLAB-based tools. Response ratios were calculated based on motor improvement (UPDRS-III) at one year. The intraoperative and postoperative best stimulation points differed significantly (p < 0.001), with a consistent dorsolateral shift of the chronic stimulation site relative to the intraoperative test position. Group-level COG analysis showed a 1.61 mm Euclidean shift. VTA overlap between intraoperative and chronic stimulation sites was low (Dice index 0.26). Intraoperative VTAs did not predict clinical outcome. Mean motor improvement was 44% (range 10–80%). No significant difference in outcome was observed between patients with bilateral central trajectories and those with non-central implantations guided by intraoperative testing (p = 0.49). Our findings demonstrate a systematic spatial difference between intraoperative and postoperative best active contact. Intraoperative VTAs, derived primarily from rigidity-based testing, did not predict global one-year motor improvement, underscoring the limited role of intraoperative testing as a universal predictor of long-term outcome. Imaging-based targeting achieved outcomes comparable to intraoperative test-guided implantation, supporting the feasibility of simplified, image-guided workflows in DBS planning. • Intraoperative and chronic STN stimulation sites differed by ∼2 mm dorsally. • No correlation was found between intraoperative VTAs and motor outcome • Image-guided targeting achieved outcomes comparable to intraoperative testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Neurosurgery X
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2025.100558
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlation of intra- and postoperative best active contact and its implication for STN-DBS outcome

Robert Nickl, Patrick Fricke, Martin M. Reich, Jonas Roothans et al.
World Neurosurgery X
Neurological disorders and treatments
article

Correlation of intra- and postoperative best active contact and its implication for STN-DBS outcome

Robert Nickl, Patrick Fricke, Martin M. Reich, Jonas Roothans, Ghadir Abbas, Hannah Mais, Cordula Matthies, Hazem Eldebakey
article en

Abstract

To assess the relationship between intraoperative test stimulation sites and postoperative best active contacts in STN-DBS for Parkinson’s disease and to evaluate whether intraoperative VTAs predict long-term outcome. We retrospectively analyzed 92 hemispheres in 46 patients undergoing bilateral STN-DBS. Coordinates of the best intraoperative stimulation point and the best active contact at one year postoperatively were compared using vector analysis. Corresponding VTAs were modeled and visualized in normalized MNI space using Guide XT and MATLAB-based tools. Response ratios were calculated based on motor improvement (UPDRS-III) at one year. The intraoperative and postoperative best stimulation points differed significantly (p < 0.001), with a consistent dorsolateral shift of the chronic stimulation site relative to the intraoperative test position. Group-level COG analysis showed a 1.61 mm Euclidean shift. VTA overlap between intraoperative and chronic stimulation sites was low (Dice index 0.26). Intraoperative VTAs did not predict clinical outcome. Mean motor improvement was 44% (range 10–80%). No significant difference in outcome was observed between patients with bilateral central trajectories and those with non-central implantations guided by intraoperative testing (p = 0.49). Our findings demonstrate a systematic spatial difference between intraoperative and postoperative best active contact. Intraoperative VTAs, derived primarily from rigidity-based testing, did not predict global one-year motor improvement, underscoring the limited role of intraoperative testing as a universal predictor of long-term outcome. Imaging-based targeting achieved outcomes comparable to intraoperative test-guided implantation, supporting the feasibility of simplified, image-guided workflows in DBS planning. • Intraoperative and chronic STN stimulation sites differed by ∼2 mm dorsally. • No correlation was found between intraoperative VTAs and motor outcome • Image-guided targeting achieved outcomes comparable to intraoperative testing.

World Neurosurgery XVol. 29
Stiftung Juliusspital (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Neurological disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.