Pre- and postfracture patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing periprosthetic femoral fractures after primary total hip arthroplasty—An observational study

ObjectivePeriprosthetic femoral fracture has become the most common reason for reoperation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after undergoing surgery due to a periprosthetic femoral fracture.MethodsPatients registered with a periprosthetic femoral fracture in the surgical theater protocols and in advance included in an institutional quality register were included in the study. PROMs were compared for each patient before primary THA, at 3 and 12 months follow-up and at the endpoint after fracture surgery. The PROMs investigated were numeric rating scale pain, Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short-form (HOOS-PS) and Forgotten Joint Score.ResultsA total of 27 patients were included in the study. Pain level after periprosthetic fracture surgery were comparable to the pain level registered at 3 and 12 months after THA. The same were found for HHS and HOOS-PS. In addition, both pain scores, HHS and HOOS-PS were significantly improved after fracture surgery compared to before the primary THA.ConclusionsPain and function scores after periprosthetic surgery were comparable to the findings at 3 and 12 months follow-up after primary THA surgery. Despite a limited number of patients, the present study report unique results including PROMs both pre- and post-THA and after the periprosthetic femoral fracture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Progress
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504251396075
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre- and postfracture patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing periprosthetic femoral fractures after primary total hip arthroplasty—An observational study

Tone Gifstad, Tina S Wik, Marte Stine Stovner
Science Progress
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

Pre- and postfracture patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing periprosthetic femoral fractures after primary total hip arthroplasty—An observational study

Tone Gifstad, Tina S Wik, Marte Stine Stovner
article en

Abstract

ObjectivePeriprosthetic femoral fracture has become the most common reason for reoperation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after undergoing surgery due to a periprosthetic femoral fracture.MethodsPatients registered with a periprosthetic femoral fracture in the surgical theater protocols and in advance included in an institutional quality register were included in the study. PROMs were compared for each patient before primary THA, at 3 and 12 months follow-up and at the endpoint after fracture surgery. The PROMs investigated were numeric rating scale pain, Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short-form (HOOS-PS) and Forgotten Joint Score.ResultsA total of 27 patients were included in the study. Pain level after periprosthetic fracture surgery were comparable to the pain level registered at 3 and 12 months after THA. The same were found for HHS and HOOS-PS. In addition, both pain scores, HHS and HOOS-PS were significantly improved after fracture surgery compared to before the primary THA.ConclusionsPain and function scores after periprosthetic surgery were comparable to the findings at 3 and 12 months follow-up after primary THA surgery. Despite a limited number of patients, the present study report unique results including PROMs both pre- and post-THA and after the periprosthetic femoral fracture.

Science ProgressVol. 108(4)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Namsos Hospital (NO), St Olav's University Hospital (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.