Developing and validating prediction models for low back pain and neck pain in office workers: a cross-sectional study

Office workers frequently report low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) related to sedentary work. While several prognostic risk factors of muscle performances have been identified, accurate predictive models are essential. This study aimed to develop and validate prediction models of LBP and NP among office workers. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 170 office workers aged 20-59 years, all with over one year of experience and daily computer use exceeding six hours. Participants underwent muscles performance tests for LBP and NP, including assessments of trunk muscles stability and endurance, lumbar lordotic curve, a multi-joint strength test and the neck strength and endurance tests. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to develop a predicting models, calculating odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Model performance was validated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), and validity indexes. The prevalence rates were 59.4% for LBP and 72.4% for NP. Higher body fat percentage was associated with an increased risk of LBP (OR:1.06, 95%CI:1.01-1.12), while a greater lumbar lordotic curve was associated with reduced risk (OR:0.96, 95%CI:0.92-0.99). For NP, greater deep neck flexor endurance was significantly associated with a lower risk (OR:0.98, 95%CI:0.97-0.99). The prediction models demonstrated acceptable discrimination, with an AUC of 0.65 (95%CI: 0.56-0.73) for LBP and 0.64 (95%CI: 0.54-0.73) for NP. The developed predictive models show potential for integration into clinical decision-making to guide the development of workplace safety and intervention programs aimed at preventing LBP and NP in office workers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30575-4
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing and validating prediction models for low back pain and neck pain in office workers: a cross-sectional study

Petcharatana Bhuanantanondh, Yassierli Yassierli, Wattana Jalayondeja, Hilmi Z. Faidullah et al.
Scientific Reports
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Developing and validating prediction models for low back pain and neck pain in office workers: a cross-sectional study

Petcharatana Bhuanantanondh, Yassierli Yassierli, Wattana Jalayondeja, Hilmi Z. Faidullah, Chutima Jalayondeja
article en

Abstract

Office workers frequently report low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) related to sedentary work. While several prognostic risk factors of muscle performances have been identified, accurate predictive models are essential. This study aimed to develop and validate prediction models of LBP and NP among office workers. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 170 office workers aged 20-59 years, all with over one year of experience and daily computer use exceeding six hours. Participants underwent muscles performance tests for LBP and NP, including assessments of trunk muscles stability and endurance, lumbar lordotic curve, a multi-joint strength test and the neck strength and endurance tests. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to develop a predicting models, calculating odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Model performance was validated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), and validity indexes. The prevalence rates were 59.4% for LBP and 72.4% for NP. Higher body fat percentage was associated with an increased risk of LBP (OR:1.06, 95%CI:1.01-1.12), while a greater lumbar lordotic curve was associated with reduced risk (OR:0.96, 95%CI:0.92-0.99). For NP, greater deep neck flexor endurance was significantly associated with a lower risk (OR:0.98, 95%CI:0.97-0.99). The prediction models demonstrated acceptable discrimination, with an AUC of 0.65 (95%CI: 0.56-0.73) for LBP and 0.64 (95%CI: 0.54-0.73) for NP. The developed predictive models show potential for integration into clinical decision-making to guide the development of workplace safety and intervention programs aimed at preventing LBP and NP in office workers.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Bandung Institute of Technology (ID), Mahidol University (TH), Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta (ID)
Mahidol University, Thai Health Promotion Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.