Effectiveness of a Nephrohospitalist Program at Two Large Tertiary Care Teaching Hospitals: Faculty Perspective Survey

Background: Growing demand for inpatient nephrology services between 2021 and 2023 prompted the creation of a non-teaching inpatient nephrology attending-only (nephrohospitalist) service at our two large teaching hospitals in 2024. Each newly hired nephrohospitalist, on weekdays, managed ~15-20 patients, previously covered by teaching services. We assessed the impact of our newly created nephrohospitalist service on our inpatient teaching faculty members. Methods: An anonymous survey was created on-line and distributed to all inpatient teaching faculty members, 10 months after the implementation of our nephrohospitalist program. Results: The survey had a 100% completion rate. Before the creation of the nephrohospitalist program, teaching faculty members indicated substantial challenges: 90% reported a diminished ability to teach, 20% a negative impact on patient care quality and/or safety, and 50% reported difficulties communicating with referring and consulting physicians. Following program implementation, all surveyed faculty reported improvements. Specifically, 100% reported having more time for teaching, improved patient care quality and safety, and better communication with other physicians. Regarding service size reduction, 30% of the respondents saw a decrease of over 30%, 60% of the respondents saw a decrease between 15-30%, and 10% of the respondents saw a decrease of less than 15%. The additional time afforded by the program was utilized in various ways: 80% experienced improved work-life balance, 20% increased office patient volume, 40% engaged in more scholarly activities, and 70% found it easier to attend divisional academic conferences. Conclusion: The implementation of a nephrohospitalist service, with its associated reduction in hospital service sizes, yielded positive effects on our teaching faculty. Faculty members reported improvements in learning opportunities, quality of care delivered, communication, work-life balance, personal well-being, and time for scholarly pursuits. Our experience highlights some potential benefits of a dedicated nephrohospitalist service in large teaching hospitals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2025rxv9850e
Primary Topic
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of a Nephrohospitalist Program at Two Large Tertiary Care Teaching Hospitals: Faculty Perspective Survey

Kenar D. Jhaveri, Daniel W. Ross, Steven Fishbane, Salman Bhutta et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
article

Effectiveness of a Nephrohospitalist Program at Two Large Tertiary Care Teaching Hospitals: Faculty Perspective Survey

Kenar D. Jhaveri, Daniel W. Ross, Steven Fishbane, Salman Bhutta, Hitesh Shah, Rimda Wanchoo, Roopal M. Sampat
article en

Abstract

Background: Growing demand for inpatient nephrology services between 2021 and 2023 prompted the creation of a non-teaching inpatient nephrology attending-only (nephrohospitalist) service at our two large teaching hospitals in 2024. Each newly hired nephrohospitalist, on weekdays, managed ~15-20 patients, previously covered by teaching services. We assessed the impact of our newly created nephrohospitalist service on our inpatient teaching faculty members. Methods: An anonymous survey was created on-line and distributed to all inpatient teaching faculty members, 10 months after the implementation of our nephrohospitalist program. Results: The survey had a 100% completion rate. Before the creation of the nephrohospitalist program, teaching faculty members indicated substantial challenges: 90% reported a diminished ability to teach, 20% a negative impact on patient care quality and/or safety, and 50% reported difficulties communicating with referring and consulting physicians. Following program implementation, all surveyed faculty reported improvements. Specifically, 100% reported having more time for teaching, improved patient care quality and safety, and better communication with other physicians. Regarding service size reduction, 30% of the respondents saw a decrease of over 30%, 60% of the respondents saw a decrease between 15-30%, and 10% of the respondents saw a decrease of less than 15%. The additional time afforded by the program was utilized in various ways: 80% experienced improved work-life balance, 20% increased office patient volume, 40% engaged in more scholarly activities, and 70% found it easier to attend divisional academic conferences. Conclusion: The implementation of a nephrohospitalist service, with its associated reduction in hospital service sizes, yielded positive effects on our teaching faculty. Faculty members reported improvements in learning opportunities, quality of care delivered, communication, work-life balance, personal well-being, and time for scholarly pursuits. Our experience highlights some potential benefits of a dedicated nephrohospitalist service in large teaching hospitals.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.