Methylation-based forensic age estimation on different biogeographic backgrounds: A study on Central Europeans, East Asians and West Africans

In recent years, the estimation of the age of a stain donor through DNA methylation has received much attention in the forensic genetics community. It can provide investigative leads for law enforcement when no DNA profile match could be obtained from a crime scene stain. It has been shown that different human populations can have systematically different methylation profiles. This raises the question whether the age of individuals from different biogeographic backgrounds is estimated with different accuracies using forensic age estimation tools. In our study, we investigated 30 individuals each from Central Europe, East Asia and West Africa. All individuals donated blood, saliva and buccal cell samples and each sample was analyzed with two forensic age estimation tools (VISAGE enhanced tool and Jung et al. SNaPshot tool). Our study showed that there were no statistically significant differences in age estimation accuracy between the three investigated populations regardless of the body fluid or age estimation tool used. The only exception was in the saliva samples, which showed statistically significant differences in age estimation errors with the VISAGE enhanced tool when comparing the East Asian and West African groups. Including knowledge about the biogeographic origin of a stain donor might therefore not be as important as previously assumed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Science International Genetics
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2025.103397
Primary Topic
Forensic and Genetic Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methylation-based forensic age estimation on different biogeographic backgrounds: A study on Central Europeans, East Asians and West Africans

Ruiyang Tao, Alex Owusu‐Ofori, Jacqueline Neubauer, Cordula Haas et al.
Forensic Science International Genetics
Forensic and Genetic Research
article

Methylation-based forensic age estimation on different biogeographic backgrounds: A study on Central Europeans, East Asians and West Africans

Ruiyang Tao, Alex Owusu‐Ofori, Jacqueline Neubauer, Cordula Haas, Charlotte Sutter, Shouyu Wang, Yaw Agyekum Boaitey
article en

Abstract

In recent years, the estimation of the age of a stain donor through DNA methylation has received much attention in the forensic genetics community. It can provide investigative leads for law enforcement when no DNA profile match could be obtained from a crime scene stain. It has been shown that different human populations can have systematically different methylation profiles. This raises the question whether the age of individuals from different biogeographic backgrounds is estimated with different accuracies using forensic age estimation tools. In our study, we investigated 30 individuals each from Central Europe, East Asia and West Africa. All individuals donated blood, saliva and buccal cell samples and each sample was analyzed with two forensic age estimation tools (VISAGE enhanced tool and Jung et al. SNaPshot tool). Our study showed that there were no statistically significant differences in age estimation accuracy between the three investigated populations regardless of the body fluid or age estimation tool used. The only exception was in the saliva samples, which showed statistically significant differences in age estimation errors with the VISAGE enhanced tool when comparing the East Asian and West African groups. Including knowledge about the biogeographic origin of a stain donor might therefore not be as important as previously assumed.

Forensic Science International GeneticsVol. 82
University of Zurich (CH), Fudan University (CN), Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (GH), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH), Institute of Forensic Science (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Forensic and Genetic Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.