Effect of Mechanical Circulatory Support on Kidney and Electrolyte Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock: A Multinational, Real-World Cohort Study

Background: Mechanical circulatory support (MCS), including left and right ventricular assist devices (LVAD/RVAD) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), is increasingly used in the management of cardiogenic shock (CS). However, its association with renal and metabolic complications remains poorly characterized in large-scale real-world populations. Methods: We analyzed data from the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, comprising 148 healthcare organizations. Adult patients (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of cardiogenic shock (ICD-10: R57.0) were identified between 2005 and 2025. Patients who received MCS (ECMO, LVAD, or RVAD; Cohort A) were compared to those without MCS (Cohort B). Outcomes included mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and electrolyte disturbances. Odds ratios (ORs), hazard ratios (HRs), and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. No propensity matching was applied. Results: Cohort A included 15,590 patients with CS who received MCS; Cohort B included 237,947 CS patients without MCS. Key findings Mortality: 49.7% vs. 44.6% (OR 1.22; p<0.001) AKI: 53.9% vs. 38.7% (OR 1.85; HR 1.42; p<0.001) ESRD: 13.3% vs. 8.9% (OR 1.57; p<0.001) CRRT: 0.4% vs. 0.2% (OR 2.71; p<0.001) Hyponatremia: 21.3% vs. 14.8% (OR 1.56; HR 1.36; p<0.001) Hypernatremia: 11.9% vs. 5.5% (OR 2.30; HR 2.00; p<0.001) Hypocalcemia: 7.8% vs. 3.9% (OR 2.10; p<0.001) Hyperkalemia: 22.7% vs. 14.7% (OR 1.71; p<0.001) Hypokalemia: 24.1% vs. 15.5% (OR 1.73; p<0.001) Hyperphosphatemia: 13.2% vs. 6.7% (OR 2.10; p<0.001) Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly shorter survival and earlier onset of renal and electrolyte complications in the MCS group. Conclusion: Among patients with cardiogenic shock, the use of mechanical circulatory support is associated with increased risks of AKI, ESRD, CRRT, and a broad spectrum of electrolyte disturbances. These findings highlight the need for early nephrology involvement and stringent metabolic monitoring in CS patients receiving MCS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2025yw5zcyr0
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Mechanical Circulatory Support on Kidney and Electrolyte Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock: A Multinational, Real-World Cohort Study

Nasrollah Ghahramani, Omar K. Salameh, Muhammad Abdulbasit, Sundus Sardar et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Effect of Mechanical Circulatory Support on Kidney and Electrolyte Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock: A Multinational, Real-World Cohort Study

Nasrollah Ghahramani, Omar K. Salameh, Muhammad Abdulbasit, Sundus Sardar, Ahmad Matarneh, Nadia Obaed, Navin Kumar Verma, Abdel‐Rauof M. Akkari
article en

Abstract

Background: Mechanical circulatory support (MCS), including left and right ventricular assist devices (LVAD/RVAD) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), is increasingly used in the management of cardiogenic shock (CS). However, its association with renal and metabolic complications remains poorly characterized in large-scale real-world populations. Methods: We analyzed data from the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, comprising 148 healthcare organizations. Adult patients (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of cardiogenic shock (ICD-10: R57.0) were identified between 2005 and 2025. Patients who received MCS (ECMO, LVAD, or RVAD; Cohort A) were compared to those without MCS (Cohort B). Outcomes included mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and electrolyte disturbances. Odds ratios (ORs), hazard ratios (HRs), and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. No propensity matching was applied. Results: Cohort A included 15,590 patients with CS who received MCS; Cohort B included 237,947 CS patients without MCS. Key findings Mortality: 49.7% vs. 44.6% (OR 1.22; p<0.001) AKI: 53.9% vs. 38.7% (OR 1.85; HR 1.42; p<0.001) ESRD: 13.3% vs. 8.9% (OR 1.57; p<0.001) CRRT: 0.4% vs. 0.2% (OR 2.71; p<0.001) Hyponatremia: 21.3% vs. 14.8% (OR 1.56; HR 1.36; p<0.001) Hypernatremia: 11.9% vs. 5.5% (OR 2.30; HR 2.00; p<0.001) Hypocalcemia: 7.8% vs. 3.9% (OR 2.10; p<0.001) Hyperkalemia: 22.7% vs. 14.7% (OR 1.71; p<0.001) Hypokalemia: 24.1% vs. 15.5% (OR 1.73; p<0.001) Hyperphosphatemia: 13.2% vs. 6.7% (OR 2.10; p<0.001) Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly shorter survival and earlier onset of renal and electrolyte complications in the MCS group. Conclusion: Among patients with cardiogenic shock, the use of mechanical circulatory support is associated with increased risks of AKI, ESRD, CRRT, and a broad spectrum of electrolyte disturbances. These findings highlight the need for early nephrology involvement and stringent metabolic monitoring in CS patients receiving MCS.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.