Comparative Behavior under Tensile and Three-Point Bending Tests for a Composite with Quadriaxial Fabrics and Epoxy Resin

This paper continues recent research of the authors, comparing the experimental results for two test types (tensile and three-point bending), obtained for the same composite. The composite was obtained from 8 layers of quadriaxial glass fiber fabric (with 1200 g/m² and (supplied by Castro Composites Spain) and a bicomponent epoxy resin SikaBiresin® CR82 (supplied by Sika Group Austria). Specimens measured 9 mm × 29 mm × 280 mm, with a bending span of 100 mm and a tensile gauge length of 150 mm. Tests were conducted at rates of 10 mm/min, 200 mm/min, 500 mm/min, and 1000 mm/min. Tests were carried out on Instron 2736-004 universal testing machine. Results show that flexural strength exceeded tensile strength by ~20–26% across all test rates, consistent with the Weibull effect. However, the absorbed energy in tension was more than six times higher than in bending, particularly at higher test rates. Stress–strain curves revealed three characteristic zones: (i) linear elastic, (ii) nonlinear up to maximum stress, and (iii) post-peak failure. Overall, the results demonstrate that mechanical characterization of composites requires both tensile and bending tests. Using only one test type may lead to incomplete or misleading evaluations of structural behavior. For engineering applications, the choice of test should reflect the dominant loading scenario in service. The study confirms that tensile tests capture the composite’s capacity for deformation and energy absorption, while bending highlights outer-layer fragility. Both test types are therefore required for reliable structural characterization and design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INCAS BULLETIN
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2025.17.4.3
Primary Topic
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Behavior under Tensile and Three-Point Bending Tests for a Composite with Quadriaxial Fabrics and Epoxy Resin

George Cătălin Cristea, George Ghiocel Ojoc, Ioana Gabriela Chiracu, Alexandru Viorel Vasiliu et al.
INCAS BULLETIN
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
article

Comparative Behavior under Tensile and Three-Point Bending Tests for a Composite with Quadriaxial Fabrics and Epoxy Resin

George Cătălin Cristea, George Ghiocel Ojoc, Ioana Gabriela Chiracu, Alexandru Viorel Vasiliu, George PELIN, Mario Constandache
article en

Abstract

This paper continues recent research of the authors, comparing the experimental results for two test types (tensile and three-point bending), obtained for the same composite. The composite was obtained from 8 layers of quadriaxial glass fiber fabric (with 1200 g/m² and (supplied by Castro Composites Spain) and a bicomponent epoxy resin SikaBiresin® CR82 (supplied by Sika Group Austria). Specimens measured 9 mm × 29 mm × 280 mm, with a bending span of 100 mm and a tensile gauge length of 150 mm. Tests were conducted at rates of 10 mm/min, 200 mm/min, 500 mm/min, and 1000 mm/min. Tests were carried out on Instron 2736-004 universal testing machine. Results show that flexural strength exceeded tensile strength by ~20–26% across all test rates, consistent with the Weibull effect. However, the absorbed energy in tension was more than six times higher than in bending, particularly at higher test rates. Stress–strain curves revealed three characteristic zones: (i) linear elastic, (ii) nonlinear up to maximum stress, and (iii) post-peak failure. Overall, the results demonstrate that mechanical characterization of composites requires both tensile and bending tests. Using only one test type may lead to incomplete or misleading evaluations of structural behavior. For engineering applications, the choice of test should reflect the dominant loading scenario in service. The study confirms that tensile tests capture the composite’s capacity for deformation and energy absorption, while bending highlights outer-layer fragility. Both test types are therefore required for reliable structural characterization and design.

INCAS BULLETIN
"Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati (RO), Autonomous Healthcare (US), National Institute for Aerospace Research Elie Carafoli (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.