Disparities in Digital Health Literacy: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Driven Evaluation of AKI Information Across Top-Ranked Websites

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major contributor to morbidity and progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). As patients increasingly turn to the internet for medical guidance, evaluating the accuracy, readability, and consistency of online AKI content is essential to improving public health education and health literacy. This updated cross-sectional study uses artificial intelligence (AI) to reanalyze the top Google search results related to AKI. Methods: In April 2025, the first ten websites generated from a Google search for “acute kidney injury” were reviewed. Each site was assessed across six clinical domains: definition, symptoms, causes, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Advanced natural language processing models (ChatGPT-4o and Google’s consensus summarizer) were utilized to evaluate sentiment polarity, consensus consistency, readability (Flesch-Kincaid grade level), and inferred public engagement based on content authority and audience targeting. Results: 40% of websites used a recovery-focused, upbeat tone, while 60% maintained a neutral clinical tone. Readability levels varied significantly, with some websites written at an 8th–9th grade level (e.g., MedlinePlus, National Kidney Foundation) and others at a college level (e.g., Wikipedia, academic institutions). High inferred engagement was found in established sources such as Mayo and Cleveland Clinics. While core information on AKI symptoms and treatments was generally consistent across platforms, substantial differences emerged in the discussion of etiologies and risk factors. Some content included complex medical classifications that may hinder comprehension among general readers. Conclusion: Significant variability persists in the tone, complexity, and accessibility of online AKI information. Applying advanced computational tools to evaluate and guide the development of digital health content may improve public understanding, support earlier recognition of AKI, and help reduce disparities in kidney health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2025xnx44n1k
Primary Topic
Social Media in Health Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities in Digital Health Literacy: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Driven Evaluation of AKI Information Across Top-Ranked Websites

Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Suryanarayanan Balakrishnan, Charat Thongprayoon, Kianoush Kashani
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Social Media in Health Education
article

Disparities in Digital Health Literacy: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Driven Evaluation of AKI Information Across Top-Ranked Websites

Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Suryanarayanan Balakrishnan, Charat Thongprayoon, Kianoush Kashani
article en

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major contributor to morbidity and progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). As patients increasingly turn to the internet for medical guidance, evaluating the accuracy, readability, and consistency of online AKI content is essential to improving public health education and health literacy. This updated cross-sectional study uses artificial intelligence (AI) to reanalyze the top Google search results related to AKI. Methods: In April 2025, the first ten websites generated from a Google search for “acute kidney injury” were reviewed. Each site was assessed across six clinical domains: definition, symptoms, causes, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Advanced natural language processing models (ChatGPT-4o and Google’s consensus summarizer) were utilized to evaluate sentiment polarity, consensus consistency, readability (Flesch-Kincaid grade level), and inferred public engagement based on content authority and audience targeting. Results: 40% of websites used a recovery-focused, upbeat tone, while 60% maintained a neutral clinical tone. Readability levels varied significantly, with some websites written at an 8th–9th grade level (e.g., MedlinePlus, National Kidney Foundation) and others at a college level (e.g., Wikipedia, academic institutions). High inferred engagement was found in established sources such as Mayo and Cleveland Clinics. While core information on AKI symptoms and treatments was generally consistent across platforms, substantial differences emerged in the discussion of etiologies and risk factors. Some content included complex medical classifications that may hinder comprehension among general readers. Conclusion: Significant variability persists in the tone, complexity, and accessibility of online AKI information. Applying advanced computational tools to evaluate and guide the development of digital health content may improve public understanding, support earlier recognition of AKI, and help reduce disparities in kidney health outcomes.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
Mayo Clinic (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Social Media in Health Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.