Impacts of state time-in-practice requirements on practice agreement use

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> Although full practice authority (FPA) laws are often framed as offering nurse practitioners (NPs) full autonomy from physicians, several recently enacted FPA laws include time-in-practice (TIP) rules that require NPs to maintain a supervisory practice agreement with a physician for a specified period. <h3>Purpose</h3> This study sought to estimate the policy impacts of TIP requirements on the proportion of NPs who retained practice agreements after FPA laws became effective in states with TIP rules (TIP group) and those with no TIP rules (No TIP group). <h3>Methods</h3> Survey data from 2016 to 2024 for 7251 full-time NPs from all 27 FPA states and the District of Columbia were obtained from the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and regression was used to adjust for measured differences between the TIP group (<i>n</i> = 3226) and the No TIP group (<i>n</i> = 4025). <h3>Results</h3> Practice agreements were 11.2 percentage points more prevalent among NPs in the TIP group compared with those in the No TIP group after adjusting for covariate differences between groups (48.7 % versus 37.5 %, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The impact of TIP rules on practice agreement use was found to be larger in states where FPA laws had been in effect longer and in states that required more supervised practice hours, whereas employer mandates for practice agreement use attenuated the impacts of TIP requirements. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Although TIP requirements were found to delay many NPs from practicing without practice agreements after an FPA law went into effect, the percentage of NPs for whom TIP requirements affect practice agreement use is limited by the fact that many healthcare employers continue to require practice agreements despite having no legal mandate to do so. States with TIP requirements for NPs should reconsider whether such requirements are necessary and consistent with other goals of health policy, such as addressing provider shortages in underserved areas. Healthcare employers should regularly review institutional requirements for practice agreements after FPA laws are implemented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nursing Regulation
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnr.2025.11.003
Primary Topic
Nursing Roles and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts of state time-in-practice requirements on practice agreement use

Eric P. Slade, Mitchell Dylan Sellers, Rita D’Aoust, Joyce Knestrick et al.
Journal of Nursing Regulation
Nursing Roles and Practices
article

Impacts of state time-in-practice requirements on practice agreement use

Eric P. Slade, Mitchell Dylan Sellers, Rita D’Aoust, Joyce Knestrick, Nancy G. Russell, Katharine W. V. Bradley
article en

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> Although full practice authority (FPA) laws are often framed as offering nurse practitioners (NPs) full autonomy from physicians, several recently enacted FPA laws include time-in-practice (TIP) rules that require NPs to maintain a supervisory practice agreement with a physician for a specified period. <h3>Purpose</h3> This study sought to estimate the policy impacts of TIP requirements on the proportion of NPs who retained practice agreements after FPA laws became effective in states with TIP rules (TIP group) and those with no TIP rules (No TIP group). <h3>Methods</h3> Survey data from 2016 to 2024 for 7251 full-time NPs from all 27 FPA states and the District of Columbia were obtained from the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and regression was used to adjust for measured differences between the TIP group (<i>n</i> = 3226) and the No TIP group (<i>n</i> = 4025). <h3>Results</h3> Practice agreements were 11.2 percentage points more prevalent among NPs in the TIP group compared with those in the No TIP group after adjusting for covariate differences between groups (48.7 % versus 37.5 %, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The impact of TIP rules on practice agreement use was found to be larger in states where FPA laws had been in effect longer and in states that required more supervised practice hours, whereas employer mandates for practice agreement use attenuated the impacts of TIP requirements. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Although TIP requirements were found to delay many NPs from practicing without practice agreements after an FPA law went into effect, the percentage of NPs for whom TIP requirements affect practice agreement use is limited by the fact that many healthcare employers continue to require practice agreements despite having no legal mandate to do so. States with TIP requirements for NPs should reconsider whether such requirements are necessary and consistent with other goals of health policy, such as addressing provider shortages in underserved areas. Healthcare employers should regularly review institutional requirements for practice agreements after FPA laws are implemented.

Journal of Nursing RegulationVol. 16(4)
Tulane University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), George Washington University Virginia Campus (US), American Association of Nurse Practitioners (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Nursing Roles and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.