Evolution of Structure and Magnetism in FeCl <sub>2</sub> and FeCl <sub>3</sub> : From Clusters to Monolayers

In this work, we address one of the most fundamental questions in cluster science─how do the structure and properties evolve from clusters to crystals? Using density functional theory (DFT), we focus our study on the evolution of structure and magnetism in iron-chloride systems, from clusters to monolayers. The choice of this system is motivated by the recent experimental confirmation of one of the author's earlier theoretical prediction that the FeCl<sub>2</sub> cluster is magnetic with a spin magnetic moment of 4 μ<sub>B</sub> localized at the Fe site, while its dimer, Fe<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>4</sub>, is antiferromagnetic. Similarly, FeCl<sub>3</sub> cluster is magnetic with a total spin magnetic moment of 5 μ<sub>B</sub>, with 4 μ<sub>B</sub> localized at the Fe site and 1 μ<sub>B</sub> distributed over the Cl sites. The dimer clusters Fe<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>4</sub> and Fe<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>6</sub> have an antiferromagnetic ground state, and upon Li-functionalization, both can be magnetically transformed from antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic states. In contrast, FeCl<sub>2</sub> and FeCl<sub>3</sub> monolayers exhibit different magnetic ground states in their periodic forms: FeCl<sub>2</sub> is ferromagnetic (FM), but in FeCl<sub>3</sub>, the antiferromagnetic (AFM) and FM states are energetically nearly degenerate. Such a difference arises due to the different chemical coordination of the Fe atoms with the Cl atoms, caused by their different oxidation states, which is +2 in FeCl<sub>2</sub> and +3 in FeCl<sub>3</sub>, respectively. Interestingly, Li-functionalization allows both FeCl<sub>3</sub> and FeCl<sub>2</sub> monolayers to be ferromagnetic. Our study highlights that several, but not all, electronic and magnetic characteristics of isolated clusters are preserved in the extended periodic structures. This systematic investigation of iron-halide clusters is expected to inspire further experimental and theoretical exploration into the magnetism of other transition metal halides.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c05632
Primary Topic
Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolution of Structure and Magnetism in FeCl 2 and FeCl 3 : From Clusters to Monolayers

Puru Jena, Manish Kumar Mohanta, Mehmet Emin Kılıç
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
article

Evolution of Structure and Magnetism in FeCl 2 and FeCl 3 : From Clusters to Monolayers

Puru Jena, Manish Kumar Mohanta, Mehmet Emin Kılıç
article en

Abstract

In this work, we address one of the most fundamental questions in cluster science─how do the structure and properties evolve from clusters to crystals? Using density functional theory (DFT), we focus our study on the evolution of structure and magnetism in iron-chloride systems, from clusters to monolayers. The choice of this system is motivated by the recent experimental confirmation of one of the author's earlier theoretical prediction that the FeCl<sub>2</sub> cluster is magnetic with a spin magnetic moment of 4 μ<sub>B</sub> localized at the Fe site, while its dimer, Fe<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>4</sub>, is antiferromagnetic. Similarly, FeCl<sub>3</sub> cluster is magnetic with a total spin magnetic moment of 5 μ<sub>B</sub>, with 4 μ<sub>B</sub> localized at the Fe site and 1 μ<sub>B</sub> distributed over the Cl sites. The dimer clusters Fe<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>4</sub> and Fe<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>6</sub> have an antiferromagnetic ground state, and upon Li-functionalization, both can be magnetically transformed from antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic states. In contrast, FeCl<sub>2</sub> and FeCl<sub>3</sub> monolayers exhibit different magnetic ground states in their periodic forms: FeCl<sub>2</sub> is ferromagnetic (FM), but in FeCl<sub>3</sub>, the antiferromagnetic (AFM) and FM states are energetically nearly degenerate. Such a difference arises due to the different chemical coordination of the Fe atoms with the Cl atoms, caused by their different oxidation states, which is +2 in FeCl<sub>2</sub> and +3 in FeCl<sub>3</sub>, respectively. Interestingly, Li-functionalization allows both FeCl<sub>3</sub> and FeCl<sub>2</sub> monolayers to be ferromagnetic. Our study highlights that several, but not all, electronic and magnetic characteristics of isolated clusters are preserved in the extended periodic structures. This systematic investigation of iron-halide clusters is expected to inspire further experimental and theoretical exploration into the magnetism of other transition metal halides.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry AVol. 130(6)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.