‘Because the kills all count the same’: Accounting for death in the Vietnam War

The US military campaign in Vietnam was supposedly a ‘limited’ war. Calculative practices were vital for military and civilian leaders in managing the conflict and claiming progress against objectives. The most infamous accounting measure was ‘body count’, one of many performance indicators used by the US military in a conflict deeply influenced by the logics and practices of war managerialism. This article explores an important example of Vietnam-era calculative practices: Sharpening the Combat Edge , a 1974 US Army handbook that provides a tangential history of the war in the Mekong Delta, while offering military commanders practical systems to ‘aid decision-making’ in current and future conflicts. Drawing on the concepts of accounting for death and war managerialism, the article deconstructs the accounting practices marshalled in this text. It argues that Sharpening is a powerful example of the legitimating roles that accounting for death can play in promoting and normalising state violence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting History
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732251389031
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Because the kills all count the same’: Accounting for death in the Vietnam War

Leo McCann
Accounting History
Accounting and Organizational Management
article

‘Because the kills all count the same’: Accounting for death in the Vietnam War

Leo McCann
article en

Abstract

The US military campaign in Vietnam was supposedly a ‘limited’ war. Calculative practices were vital for military and civilian leaders in managing the conflict and claiming progress against objectives. The most infamous accounting measure was ‘body count’, one of many performance indicators used by the US military in a conflict deeply influenced by the logics and practices of war managerialism. This article explores an important example of Vietnam-era calculative practices: Sharpening the Combat Edge , a 1974 US Army handbook that provides a tangential history of the war in the Mekong Delta, while offering military commanders practical systems to ‘aid decision-making’ in current and future conflicts. Drawing on the concepts of accounting for death and war managerialism, the article deconstructs the accounting practices marshalled in this text. It argues that Sharpening is a powerful example of the legitimating roles that accounting for death can play in promoting and normalising state violence.

Accounting HistoryVol. 31(1)
University of York (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Accounting and Organizational Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.