Quantifying the direct and indirect impact of COVID-19 vaccination: evidence from Victoria, Australia
Vaccines not only directly protect vaccinated individuals but also contribute to protecting the entire population via indirect herd-immunity benefits. However, researchers have long struggled to quantify these indirect effects at the population level, hindering the assessment of vaccination programme effectiveness. We developed a new method to estimate these effects, thereby markedly improving measures of the number of infections, hospitalizations and deaths averted by vaccination. Our population-based analysis of 6 440 000 residents of Victoria, Australia, reveals strong indirect effects during the Delta outbreak (September-November 2021). By modelling a non-vaccination counterfactual, we conservatively estimate 315 000 infections were averted (95% Bayesian credible interval (BCI): 231k-406k), as well as 33 400 hospitalizations (95% BCI: 22k-46k), and 4900 deaths (95% BCI: 2.8k-7.2k). These are 4.0, 7.5 and 8.0 times higher, respectively, than observed. Half of the averted infections and around one-quarter of hospitalizations and deaths were attributable to indirect protection. Homogeneous vaccination across local government areas could have reduced outcomes by approximately 25%.
Authors
- James McCracken Trauer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0991-1631)
- Peter Eizenberg
- Haydar Demirhan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8565-4710)
- Lewi Stone (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6465-579X)
- Lixin Lin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8339-5965)
Institutions
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- MIT University (MK)
- Monash Health (AU)
- Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yafo (IL)
- Monash University (AU)
- RMIT University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Published
- 2026-09-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2025.0839
- Primary Topic
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00