Comparison of Outcomes for Paired Kidney Exchange, End Chain, and Directed Donor Living-Donor Kidney Transplants

Background: Living donor kidney transplants (LDKT) comprise roughly a quarter of all kidney transplants in the US. Directed donor LDKT (D-LDKT) remains the most common, but rising rates of Paired Kidney Exchange LDKT (PKE-LDKT) and End Chain LDKT (EC-LDKT) have expanded access for many waitlisted patients. This study compares graft and patient survival across these LDKT sources. Methods: We evaluated adult LDKT recipients at the University of Pennsylvania between 1/1/2015 and 11/30/2023. Clinical data on recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics were collected from electronic medical records. Any graft or patient loss was analyzed using Kaplan Meier survival analysis. Results: Donor age, cold ischemia time, zero HLA mismatch (all p<0.001), and recipient pre-emptive transplant (p=0.002) differ significantly across LDKT groups. On Kaplan Meier analysis, there is no difference in patient survival (p=0.12; Fig 1) or kidney graft survival (p=0.81; Fig 2). Conclusion: Our study shows similar graft and patient outcomes across D-LDKT, PKE-LDKT and EC-LDKT pathways. Increased participation of transplant programs in PKE and EC-LDKT can improve access to LDKT for more waitlisted patients.Fig 2Fig 1 Baseline Characteristics of the Cohort - Directed Donor LDKT (N = 413) NKR End Chain (N = 49) NKR KPD (N = 124) P-value Recipient age (years) 49 (14) 49 (12) 49 (14) 0.79 Recipient female gender 143 (34.6%) 25 (51.0%) 53 (42.7%) 0.05 Recipient pre-emptive transplant 248 (60.0%) 18 (36.7%) 60 (48.4%) 0.002 Donor age (years) 46 (12) 55 (12) 42 (12) < 0.001 Donor female gender 279 (67.6%) 33 (67.3%) 75 (60.5%) 0.78 Cold ischemia time 1.6 (1.6) 4.7 (3.4) 9.8 (4.6) < 0.001 Zero HLA mismatch 19 (4.6%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (1.6%) <0.001

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2025n2mtpdb1
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Outcomes for Paired Kidney Exchange, End Chain, and Directed Donor Living-Donor Kidney Transplants

Divyash V. Shah, Srijan Tandukar, Pranav S. Kancherla, Sneha Chandrashekar et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Organ Donation and Transplantation
article

Comparison of Outcomes for Paired Kidney Exchange, End Chain, and Directed Donor Living-Donor Kidney Transplants

Divyash V. Shah, Srijan Tandukar, Pranav S. Kancherla, Sneha Chandrashekar, Misha R Bankulla
article en

Abstract

Background: Living donor kidney transplants (LDKT) comprise roughly a quarter of all kidney transplants in the US. Directed donor LDKT (D-LDKT) remains the most common, but rising rates of Paired Kidney Exchange LDKT (PKE-LDKT) and End Chain LDKT (EC-LDKT) have expanded access for many waitlisted patients. This study compares graft and patient survival across these LDKT sources. Methods: We evaluated adult LDKT recipients at the University of Pennsylvania between 1/1/2015 and 11/30/2023. Clinical data on recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics were collected from electronic medical records. Any graft or patient loss was analyzed using Kaplan Meier survival analysis. Results: Donor age, cold ischemia time, zero HLA mismatch (all p<0.001), and recipient pre-emptive transplant (p=0.002) differ significantly across LDKT groups. On Kaplan Meier analysis, there is no difference in patient survival (p=0.12; Fig 1) or kidney graft survival (p=0.81; Fig 2). Conclusion: Our study shows similar graft and patient outcomes across D-LDKT, PKE-LDKT and EC-LDKT pathways. Increased participation of transplant programs in PKE and EC-LDKT can improve access to LDKT for more waitlisted patients.Fig 2Fig 1 Baseline Characteristics of the Cohort - Directed Donor LDKT (N = 413) NKR End Chain (N = 49) NKR KPD (N = 124) P-value Recipient age (years) 49 (14) 49 (12) 49 (14) 0.79 Recipient female gender 143 (34.6%) 25 (51.0%) 53 (42.7%) 0.05 Recipient pre-emptive transplant 248 (60.0%) 18 (36.7%) 60 (48.4%) 0.002 Donor age (years) 46 (12) 55 (12) 42 (12) < 0.001 Donor female gender 279 (67.6%) 33 (67.3%) 75 (60.5%) 0.78 Cold ischemia time 1.6 (1.6) 4.7 (3.4) 9.8 (4.6) < 0.001 Zero HLA mismatch 19 (4.6%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (1.6%) <0.001

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Outcomes for Paired Kidney Exchange, End Chain, and Directed Donor Living-Donor Kidney Transplants — Divyash V. Shah, Srijan Tandukar, et al. · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS