EFFICACY OF LOW-FREQUENCY WHOLE-BODY ELECTROMYOSTIMULATION IN NONSPECIFIC CHRONIC BACK PAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Background and AimsNonspecific chronic back pain (NSCBP) is a prevalent global condition, significantly contributing to disability and impacting quality of life worldwide.Its management is often limited by conventional exercise barriers, such as time constraints and comorbidities.Whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) offers a promising alternative, being a time-efficient and joint-friendly intervention.This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of low-frequency WB-EMS in alleviating pain and enhancing function in NSCBP patients. MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, PubMed and PEDro databases were systematically searched for clinical trials involving adults with NSCBP, focusing on RCTs or CCTs with WB-EMS interventions.Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed quality using the PEDro Scale.A narrative synthesis and meta-analysis pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals, evaluating heterogeneity via I. ResultsSix studies (n = 677; WB-EMS: 278, controls: 329), including four RCTs, one CCT, and one meta-analysis (2017-2023), were analyzed.LF WB-EMS (20-minute weekly sessions, 8-16 weeks, 50-85 Hz) significantly reduced pain (-0.60 to -1.58 NRS/VAS) and improved function (+7.19 kg trunk strength to -15.8 ODI).Meta-analysis revealed a pooled pain reduction of -0.87 (95% CI [-1.02, -0.72], I = 70%) and functional SMD of 0.84 (95% CI [0.68, 0.99], I = 76%).Compared to passive controls (n = 15/group), effect sizes were 0.75 for pain and 0.85 for function; against active controls, pooled effects were 0.33 (pain, I = 96%) and 0.28 (function, I = 92%). ConclusionLF WB-EMS effectively mitigates NSCBP symptoms, showing strong within-group effects and competitive outcomes against controls, suggesting potential superiority over some therapies.Its efficiency and safety make it also suitable for patients with joint problems.However, small passive control sample sizes and high active control heterogeneity necessitate larger, standardized trials.Further research on medium-frequency WB-EMS and comparisons with LF-EMS is needed to optimize protocols and long-term outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fizikalna i rehabilitacijska medicina
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21751/frm-39-3-4-174
Primary Topic
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFFICACY OF LOW-FREQUENCY WHOLE-BODY ELECTROMYOSTIMULATION IN NONSPECIFIC CHRONIC BACK PAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Karl Lorenz Konrad
Fizikalna i rehabilitacijska medicina
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
article

EFFICACY OF LOW-FREQUENCY WHOLE-BODY ELECTROMYOSTIMULATION IN NONSPECIFIC CHRONIC BACK PAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Karl Lorenz Konrad
article en

Abstract

Background and AimsNonspecific chronic back pain (NSCBP) is a prevalent global condition, significantly contributing to disability and impacting quality of life worldwide.Its management is often limited by conventional exercise barriers, such as time constraints and comorbidities.Whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) offers a promising alternative, being a time-efficient and joint-friendly intervention.This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of low-frequency WB-EMS in alleviating pain and enhancing function in NSCBP patients. MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, PubMed and PEDro databases were systematically searched for clinical trials involving adults with NSCBP, focusing on RCTs or CCTs with WB-EMS interventions.Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed quality using the PEDro Scale.A narrative synthesis and meta-analysis pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals, evaluating heterogeneity via I. ResultsSix studies (n = 677; WB-EMS: 278, controls: 329), including four RCTs, one CCT, and one meta-analysis (2017-2023), were analyzed.LF WB-EMS (20-minute weekly sessions, 8-16 weeks, 50-85 Hz) significantly reduced pain (-0.60 to -1.58 NRS/VAS) and improved function (+7.19 kg trunk strength to -15.8 ODI).Meta-analysis revealed a pooled pain reduction of -0.87 (95% CI [-1.02, -0.72], I = 70%) and functional SMD of 0.84 (95% CI [0.68, 0.99], I = 76%).Compared to passive controls (n = 15/group), effect sizes were 0.75 for pain and 0.85 for function; against active controls, pooled effects were 0.33 (pain, I = 96%) and 0.28 (function, I = 92%). ConclusionLF WB-EMS effectively mitigates NSCBP symptoms, showing strong within-group effects and competitive outcomes against controls, suggesting potential superiority over some therapies.Its efficiency and safety make it also suitable for patients with joint problems.However, small passive control sample sizes and high active control heterogeneity necessitate larger, standardized trials.Further research on medium-frequency WB-EMS and comparisons with LF-EMS is needed to optimize protocols and long-term outcomes.

Fizikalna i rehabilitacijska medicina
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.