Deafblind interpreter practice and training

Abstract Deafblind people have complex interpreting needs that often go beyond interlingual transfer. Their communicative profiles vary across various modes — visual, tactile and verbal — yet comparatively little is known about the repertoire of modes used by interpreters who work with deafblind people. Existing research shows that the communicative capacities and preferences of deafblind people encompass close-range signing, visual frame signing, tactile signing, haptics, print-on-palm, re-speaking and Protactile. This article presents empirical findings of 149 deafblind interpreters’ reported practices relating to their mode and frequency of work. Our overview of interpreter practice is followed by an examination of interpreters’ training experiences. This mirrors the typical path for interpreters, who first gain sign-language interpreting skills and then develop deafblind-specific sign-language interpreting skills as they start to work with deafblind people. Where pre-practice training was available, it seldom included content on deafblind communication beyond a basic introduction, if at all. Thus, the acquisition of knowledge and skills about deafblind interpreting, for most but not all, usually occurs after commencing work in the field. Focusing on responses that report on the positive aspects of professional development training, we conclude by providing recommendations on knowledge areas, skills and activities that could be catered for during training for interpreters looking to work in this field and also for those already practising as deafblind interpreters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interpreting International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00128.hla
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deafblind interpreter practice and training

Louisa Willoughby, Howard Manns, Shimako Iwasaki, Jim Hlavač et al.
Interpreting International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

Deafblind interpreter practice and training

Louisa Willoughby, Howard Manns, Shimako Iwasaki, Jim Hlavač, Meredith Bartlett, Meredith Prain
article en

Abstract

Abstract Deafblind people have complex interpreting needs that often go beyond interlingual transfer. Their communicative profiles vary across various modes — visual, tactile and verbal — yet comparatively little is known about the repertoire of modes used by interpreters who work with deafblind people. Existing research shows that the communicative capacities and preferences of deafblind people encompass close-range signing, visual frame signing, tactile signing, haptics, print-on-palm, re-speaking and Protactile. This article presents empirical findings of 149 deafblind interpreters’ reported practices relating to their mode and frequency of work. Our overview of interpreter practice is followed by an examination of interpreters’ training experiences. This mirrors the typical path for interpreters, who first gain sign-language interpreting skills and then develop deafblind-specific sign-language interpreting skills as they start to work with deafblind people. Where pre-practice training was available, it seldom included content on deafblind communication beyond a basic introduction, if at all. Thus, the acquisition of knowledge and skills about deafblind interpreting, for most but not all, usually occurs after commencing work in the field. Focusing on responses that report on the positive aspects of professional development training, we conclude by providing recommendations on knowledge areas, skills and activities that could be catered for during training for interpreters looking to work in this field and also for those already practising as deafblind interpreters.

Interpreting International Journal of Research and Practice in InterpretingVol. 28(1)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (CN), Xiamen University (CN), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash University (AU), Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.