Investigating the Safety of Pedestrians at Signalized Intersection Crosswalks in Left-Hand Driving Scenarios

In a developing nation such as India, the rapid increase in road traffic has led to more frequent encounters when vehicles and pedestrians travel through signalized intersections. In an Indian traffic scenario, a signal is designed such that, irrespective of the ongoing phase of the adjacent arms, the pedestrians of a given arm are in the walking phase. This leads to more frequent interaction of pedestrians with vehicles turning toward the right and left from the adjacent arm. In this scenario, pedestrian safety was assessed in this study using advanced trajectory-based data and the evasive actions taken by vehicles during potential pedestrian–vehicle conflicts. Further, the risk of pedestrian–vehicle conflicts was examined using the traffic conflict technique employing five key time-based conflict indicators: the postencroachment time, time to vehicle, deceleration to safety time, time to accident, and time to collision. The risk level of pedestrian–vehicle conflicts was categorized into high (A), medium (B), and low (C) levels using supervised machine-learning algorithms, such as support vector machine, K-nearest neighbors, and the random forest classifier. The proposed crash risk levels were further used to analyze the frequency of crashes at four- and three-legged signalized intersections when pedestrians interact with left-turning (LT) and right-turning (RT) traffic. The influence of conflicting vehicle type on the risk levels of pedestrian–vehicle crash was also assessed. The results showed that the maximum conflict of LT and RT vehicles with pedestrians is at a medium risk at the selected four-legged and three-legged signalized intersections, respectively. Also, a high crash risk was observed while pedestrians interacted with right- and left-turning two-wheelers at all the study intersections. Overall, the study’s findings may help to evaluate the potential crash scenario at crosswalks and assess pedestrians’ safety at signalized intersections in the left-hand driving scenario.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A Systems
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.teeng-9185
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the Safety of Pedestrians at Signalized Intersection Crosswalks in Left-Hand Driving Scenarios

Arpita Saha, Geeta Peche
Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A Systems
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Investigating the Safety of Pedestrians at Signalized Intersection Crosswalks in Left-Hand Driving Scenarios

Arpita Saha, Geeta Peche
article en

Abstract

In a developing nation such as India, the rapid increase in road traffic has led to more frequent encounters when vehicles and pedestrians travel through signalized intersections. In an Indian traffic scenario, a signal is designed such that, irrespective of the ongoing phase of the adjacent arms, the pedestrians of a given arm are in the walking phase. This leads to more frequent interaction of pedestrians with vehicles turning toward the right and left from the adjacent arm. In this scenario, pedestrian safety was assessed in this study using advanced trajectory-based data and the evasive actions taken by vehicles during potential pedestrian–vehicle conflicts. Further, the risk of pedestrian–vehicle conflicts was examined using the traffic conflict technique employing five key time-based conflict indicators: the postencroachment time, time to vehicle, deceleration to safety time, time to accident, and time to collision. The risk level of pedestrian–vehicle conflicts was categorized into high (A), medium (B), and low (C) levels using supervised machine-learning algorithms, such as support vector machine, K-nearest neighbors, and the random forest classifier. The proposed crash risk levels were further used to analyze the frequency of crashes at four- and three-legged signalized intersections when pedestrians interact with left-turning (LT) and right-turning (RT) traffic. The influence of conflicting vehicle type on the risk levels of pedestrian–vehicle crash was also assessed. The results showed that the maximum conflict of LT and RT vehicles with pedestrians is at a medium risk at the selected four-legged and three-legged signalized intersections, respectively. Also, a high crash risk was observed while pedestrians interacted with right- and left-turning two-wheelers at all the study intersections. Overall, the study’s findings may help to evaluate the potential crash scenario at crosswalks and assess pedestrians’ safety at signalized intersections in the left-hand driving scenario.

Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A SystemsVol. 152(2)
Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigating the Safety of Pedestrians at Signalized Intersection Crosswalks in Left-Hand Driving Scenarios — Arpita Saha, Geeta Peche · Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS