Does Corporate Tax Planning Affect Firm Productivity?

We examine the relation between corporate tax planning and firm-level productivity. Using a sample of U.S. public firms from 1993 to 2017, we find that tax planning is positively associated with productivity. Our findings further indicate that tax planning contributes to growth in production input factors: capital and labor. We also test the underlying mechanisms, documenting that the observed association between productivity and tax planning is more pronounced in financially constrained and knowledge capital–intensive firms. We exploit the initiation of new banking relationships and the introduction of Check-the-Box regulations as sources of tax planning variation to facilitate difference-in-differences analyses. The empirical evidence holds consistently across a wide array of robustness tests. Taken together, the results enhance the understanding on the economic implications of tax planning and provide insights for informed tax policy debates. This paper was accepted by Suraj Srinivasan, accounting. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03569 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03569
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Corporate Tax Planning Affect Firm Productivity?

Konstantinos Stathopoulos, Spyridon Gkikopoulos, Edward Lee
Management Science
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

Does Corporate Tax Planning Affect Firm Productivity?

Konstantinos Stathopoulos, Spyridon Gkikopoulos, Edward Lee
article en

Abstract

We examine the relation between corporate tax planning and firm-level productivity. Using a sample of U.S. public firms from 1993 to 2017, we find that tax planning is positively associated with productivity. Our findings further indicate that tax planning contributes to growth in production input factors: capital and labor. We also test the underlying mechanisms, documenting that the observed association between productivity and tax planning is more pronounced in financially constrained and knowledge capital–intensive firms. We exploit the initiation of new banking relationships and the introduction of Check-the-Box regulations as sources of tax planning variation to facilitate difference-in-differences analyses. The empirical evidence holds consistently across a wide array of robustness tests. Taken together, the results enhance the understanding on the economic implications of tax planning and provide insights for informed tax policy debates. This paper was accepted by Suraj Srinivasan, accounting. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03569 .

Management Science
University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.